Comparison between the accredited and non-accredited public hospital working environments
Carregando...
Fonte externa
Fonte externa
Data
Orientador
Coorientador
Pós-graduação
Curso de graduação
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Enfermagen
Tipo
Artigo
Direito de acesso
Acesso aberto
Fonte externa
Fonte externa
Resumo
Objective: To compare and identify the working environment of accredited and non-accredited public hospitals. Methods: A quantitative approach with two cross-sectional studies in parallel, with 106 nurses from the hospitals, conducted between January and September of 2014. Hospital A was not accredited, and Hospital B was accredited. Data collection used a questionnaire with sociodemographic labor information and the Nursing Work Index - Revised - Brazilian version (B-NWI-R), with 57 items and four domains. The reliability of the instrument was measured using Cronbach's alpha. Results: The participants included 50 nurses of Hospital A and 56 of Hospital B. Hospitals were compared; there were statistically significant wage satisfaction (Hospital A showed greater salary satisfaction) and working hours (30-36 hours per week in Hospital B; 40 hours in Hospital A). The environment was favorable to the four domains of B-NWI-R in both hospitals, regardless of accreditation status. Conclusion: The administration of the instrument showed that hospital accreditation did not affect the nurses' work environment.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Practice management, Working environment, Accreditation, Quality of health care, Job satisfaction
Idioma
Inglês
Citação
Acta Paulista De Enfermagem. Sao Paulo: Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Enfermagen, v. 29, n. 1, p. 53-59, 2016.
