Effect of light curing sources on microhardness of different composite resins
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2011-06-01
Autores
Valentino, T. A.
Calabrez-Filho, S.
de Menezes, F. C. H.
Cavalcante, L. M. A.
Pimenta, L. A. F.
de Andrade, M. F. [UNESP]
Dantas, Andréa Abi Rached [UNESP]
Rastelli, Alessandra Nara de Souza [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Maik Nauka/interperiodica/springer
Resumo
This study evaluated the influence of light-curing units (LCUs) on Knoop microhardness (KHN) of different composite resins formulations. Four LCUs, one Quartz-Tungsten-Halogen (QTH) for 20 s, one Argon-Ion-Laser (AL) for 10 s, one Plasma-Arc-Curing (PAC) for 9 s, and one Light-Emitting-Diode (LED) for 20 s, and three composite resins, nanofill and easy cure (Filtek (TM) Supreme), microhybrid and medium cure (Herculite XRV), and microfill and difficult cure (Heliomolar) were used. Discs (4 x 2 mm(2)) of each composite resin were divided in 12 Groups and KHN was measured at the top (T) and bottom (B) surfaces. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05). Top presented significantly higher KHN than bottom surface for all composite resins and LCUs tested. Statistical significant differences were observed among the LCUs. At the bottom surface QTH and LED presented higher KHN than PAC and LA. However, at the top surface PAC and LA presented similar results than QTH for nanofill and microhybrid composite resins. Different LCUs play an important effect on Knoop microhardness and the composite resin formulations were significant factor on the photosensitivity.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Como citar
Laser Physics. New York: Maik Nauka/interperiodica/springer, v. 21, n. 6, p. 1130-1134, 2011.