Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Carlos Eduardo De Almeida
dc.contributor.authorBrandão, Roberto Carlos Bodart
dc.contributor.authorMartinelli, Carolina Borges
dc.contributor.authorPignaton, Túliobonna [UNESP]
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:43:14Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:43:14Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-01
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.3.116-125.sar
dc.identifier.citationDental Press Journal of Orthodontics, v. 21, n. 3, p. 116-125, 2016.
dc.identifier.issn2177-6709
dc.identifier.issn2176-9451
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/168825
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of guided bone regeneration (GBR) carried out with xenogenic bone substitute (Bio- Oss™) and collagen resorbable membrane (Bio-GideTM) to improve gingival smile (GS) in patients with excessive vertical maxillary growth (EVMG). Methods: Twelve healthy women aged between 20 and 49 years old (mean age of 26 years), with 5 mm or more of gingival exposure during fully posed smile (FPS) due to EVMG, were included. Baseline digital photographs were taken with standardized head position at rest and FPS. In eight out of 12 cases, crown lengthening procedure was indicated and the initial incision was made 2 to 4 mm from the gingival margin. In four cases, with no indication for crown lengthening procedure, a sulcular incision was performed. GBR was performed in all cases, using micro screws and/or titanium mesh associated with Bio-Oss™ and Bio-Gide™. After 10 days, sutures were removed. Recall appointments were scheduled at 1, 6, and 12 months when standardized photographs were again taken. ImageTool™ software was used to measure the gingival exposure (GE) during FPS from the standardized close-up smile photographs at baseline and 12 months. Results: GE mean at baseline was 275.44 mm2. After 12 months, patients who undergone exclusively GBR procedure, presented GE reduction of 40.7%, Δ = 112.01 mm2 (statistically significant, p = 0.12), and patients who had crown lengthening associated with the graft had a reduction of 60%, Δ = 167.01 mm2. Conclusion: Our results using GBR to improve GS in cases of EVMG showed an exceptionally high patient acceptance and satisfaction. One-year follow-up confirmed stable results.en
dc.format.extent116-125
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofDental Press Journal of Orthodontics
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBone regeneration
dc.subjectDental esthetics
dc.subjectMaxillofacial development
dc.titleImproving gingival smile by means of guided bone regeneration principlesen
dc.typeArtigo
dc.contributor.institutionState University of New York
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
dc.contributor.institutionSao Leopoldo Mandic
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.description.affiliationState University of New York
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal do Espirito Santo (UFES)
dc.description.affiliationSao Leopoldo Mandic
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/2177-6709.21.3.116-125.sar
dc.identifier.scieloS2176-94512016000300116
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84978879683
dc.identifier.fileS2176-94512016000300116.pdf
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,489
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,489
Localize o texto completo

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record