Desempenho operacional do conjunto trator-recolhedora de feijão
Carregando...
Data
2008-08-01
Autores
Silva, Rouverson Pereira da [UNESP]
Reis, Leandro Daniel [UNESP]
Reis, Gustavo Naves dos [UNESP]
Furlani, Carlos Eduardo Angeli [UNESP]
Lopes, Afonso [UNESP]
Cortez, Jorge Wilson [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
Resumo
A colheita mecanizada do feijão apresenta altos custos. Além disso, as características botânicas e a alta tendência ao acamamento do feijoeiro dificultam o uso de colhedoras combinadas. O presente trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar o desempenho operacional do conjunto trator-recolhedora-trilhadora de feijão e quantificar as perdas ocasionadas durante a colheita, em Jaboticabal, SP. Foi utilizado delineamento inteiramente casualizado, com fatorial 2 x 3, combinando-se dois sistemas de preparo de solo (convencional e plantio direto) e três velocidades teóricas de trabalho (V1, V2 e V3, correspondendo a 4,0; 4,9 e 5,8km h-1, respectivamente), com quatro repetições, totalizando 24 observações. O nível de ruído, os consumos volumétrico e ponderal, a taxa de alimentação da máquina, a matéria seca e a densidade da palhada, as perdas na plataforma da recolhedora e totais não são influenciadas pelos sistemas de preparo do solo (preparo convencional e plantio direto) e pelas velocidades de trabalho. As perdas ocorridas no sistema de trilha, separação e limpeza são menores na velocidade de 4,9km h-1.
Mechanized harvesting of beans has a high cost. on the other hand, the botanical characteristics and the high tendency for lodging of bean planting make the combined use of harvesters difficult. This paper aimed to evaluate the operational performance of the pull-type bean combine and to quantify losses in bean harvest. The experiment was carried out in the experimental field of the São Paulo State University in the city of Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. The field trial was in randomized blocks, in a 2 x 3 factorial scheme, combining two soil tillage systems (conventional and no-tillage) and three theoretical working speeds (V1, V2 and V3, respectively 4.0, 4.9 and 5.8km h-1). Four repetitions of the scheme totaled up 24 observations. The analyzed factors (tillage systems and working speeds) did not affect noise level, volume and weight of fuel consumption, machine feeding flow, dry matter and straw density, losses at the harvester platform and total losses. The losses with threshing, separation and cleaning were lesser in the 4.9km h-1 speed.
Mechanized harvesting of beans has a high cost. on the other hand, the botanical characteristics and the high tendency for lodging of bean planting make the combined use of harvesters difficult. This paper aimed to evaluate the operational performance of the pull-type bean combine and to quantify losses in bean harvest. The experiment was carried out in the experimental field of the São Paulo State University in the city of Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. The field trial was in randomized blocks, in a 2 x 3 factorial scheme, combining two soil tillage systems (conventional and no-tillage) and three theoretical working speeds (V1, V2 and V3, respectively 4.0, 4.9 and 5.8km h-1). Four repetitions of the scheme totaled up 24 observations. The analyzed factors (tillage systems and working speeds) did not affect noise level, volume and weight of fuel consumption, machine feeding flow, dry matter and straw density, losses at the harvester platform and total losses. The losses with threshing, separation and cleaning were lesser in the 4.9km h-1 speed.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
mechanical harvesting, Fuel consumption, Harvesting losses, Colheita mecanizada, Consumo de combustível, Perdas na colheita
Como citar
Ciência Rural. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), v. 38, n. 5, p. 1286-1291, 2008.