Viabilidade produtiva e econômica do consórcio entre chicória e rúcula em função da época de plantio
Carregando...
Data
2008-09-01
Autores
Cecílio Filho, Arthur Bernardes [UNESP]
Costa, Caciana C
Rezende, Bráulio Luciano A [UNESP]
van Leeuwen, Ricardo
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Associação Brasileira de Horticultura
Resumo
Para avaliar o efeito da consorciação das culturas de chicória e da rúcula sobre suas produtividades, foi conduzido um experimento de 23/07 a 12/11/03, na UNESP-FCAV. Os 11 tratamentos foram constituídos por consórcios de chicória e rúcula, estabelecidos com a semeadura da rúcula aos 0; 5; 10; 15 e 20 dias após o transplante (DAT) da chicória e pelas monoculturas nas respectivas épocas de consórcio. O delineamento experimental foi o de blocos ao acaso, com quatro repetições. A rúcula, independente da época em que foi semeada, não influenciou a produtividade da chicória. A matéria fresca da parte aérea da rúcula (MFRu) foi influenciada significativamente pela interação dos fatores avaliados. Quanto mais atrasada a semeadura da rúcula em relação ao transplante da chicória, menor foi a MFRu. A produção de MFRu em consórcio não diferiu da obtida em monocultura quando a semeadura da rúcula foi realizada até 10 DAT da chicória. O melhor consórcio sob o ponto de vista do índice de eficiência de uso da área (EUA = 2,29), da receita líquida (R$ 75.873,09/ha) e da taxa de retorno (TR = 14,17) foi obtido em consórcio estabelecido com a semeadura da rúcula no mesmo dia do transplante da chicória.
The experiment was carried out in São Paulo State, Brazil, aiming to evaluate the effect of the intercropping on endive and rocket yields. The 11 treatments were constituted from endive and rocket intercropping, established at 0; 5; 10; 15 and 20 days after the endive transplant (DAET) and also the monocultures for all time of intercropping. The experimental design were randomized complete blocks, with eleven treatments and four replications. Independent of sowing time of rocket, the endive yield was not influenced. The fresh matter of the aerial part of the rocket (FMR) was significantly influenced by the interaction of the assessed factors. The later sowing of the rocket in relation to the chicory transplant, the smaller was FMR. The production of FMR in intercropping didn't differ from that obtained in monoculture when the sowing of the rocket was accomplished at 10 DAT of endive. The best intercropping in terms of efficient use of the area (EUA = 2.29), net revenue (R$ 75.873,09/ha) and rate of return (RR = 14.17) was obtained when the rocket sowing in intercropping was established on the same day as the chicory transplant.
The experiment was carried out in São Paulo State, Brazil, aiming to evaluate the effect of the intercropping on endive and rocket yields. The 11 treatments were constituted from endive and rocket intercropping, established at 0; 5; 10; 15 and 20 days after the endive transplant (DAET) and also the monocultures for all time of intercropping. The experimental design were randomized complete blocks, with eleven treatments and four replications. Independent of sowing time of rocket, the endive yield was not influenced. The fresh matter of the aerial part of the rocket (FMR) was significantly influenced by the interaction of the assessed factors. The later sowing of the rocket in relation to the chicory transplant, the smaller was FMR. The production of FMR in intercropping didn't differ from that obtained in monoculture when the sowing of the rocket was accomplished at 10 DAT of endive. The best intercropping in terms of efficient use of the area (EUA = 2.29), net revenue (R$ 75.873,09/ha) and rate of return (RR = 14.17) was obtained when the rocket sowing in intercropping was established on the same day as the chicory transplant.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Cichorium endivia, Eruca sativa, cropping system, land equivalent ratio, intercropping, profitability, Cichorium endivia, Eruca sativa, Sistema de cultivo, uso eficiente da área, consorciação, Rentabilidade
Como citar
Horticultura Brasileira. Associação Brasileira de Horticultura, v. 26, n. 3, p. 316-320, 2008.