Etch-and-rinse versus self-etch strategy of a universal adhesive in different application methods at the bonding interface of fiber post cementation

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorBarros, Antonia Patricia Oliveira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Melo Alencar, Cristiane
dc.contributor.authorZambon, Matheus [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Andrade, Marcelo Ferrarezi [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFernández, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorKuga, Milton Carlos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity Center of the State of Pará
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidad Autonoma de Chile
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-29T16:14:14Z
dc.date.available2023-07-29T16:14:14Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the effect of etch-and-rinse (ER) versus self-etch (SE) strategies of a universal adhesive applied with a manual brush (MB) or rotary brush (RB) on the bonding interface of fiber post cementation. Methods: Forty bovine incisor roots were prepared and divided into four groups according to the methods of application and strategy of universal adhesive use (MB-ER, RB-ER, MB-SE and RB-SE). After 6 months, specimens from different thirds of the post space were evaluated of push-out strength, analysis of adhesive failure patterns, and extent of tags. Results: The RB-ER and RB-SE groups showed the highest bond strength values in the cervical and middle thirds of the post space. Cohesive adhesive failure had the highest incidence in the different thirds of the post space in the ER strategy, regardless of the adhesive application method. The RB-ER group showed the highest tag extensions. Conclusions: The protocols of universal adhesive application with RB provided the greater bond strength, but only the ER strategy favored the formation of a greater extension of tags at the adhesive interface. Clinical Significance: The application of universal adhesive with RB into the post space increases the strength of the post-cemented fiber bond.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Operative Dentistry Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry University Center of the State of Pará
dc.description.affiliationInstituto de Ciencias Biomédicas Universidad Autonoma de Chile
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Operative Dentistry Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13068
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jerd.13068
dc.identifier.issn1708-8240
dc.identifier.issn1496-4155
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85159924574
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/249970
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectadhesive
dc.subjectbond strength
dc.subjectcementation
dc.subjectfailure
dc.subjectfiber post
dc.subjectprotocols
dc.titleEtch-and-rinse versus self-etch strategy of a universal adhesive in different application methods at the bonding interface of fiber post cementationen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1036-8776[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0694-6863[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5728-8293[6]

Arquivos

Coleções

Artigos - Odontologia Restauradora - FOAR