Retention system and splinting on morse taper implants in the posterior maxilla by 3D finite element analysis

dc.contributor.authorLemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVerri, Fellippo Ramos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSantiago Júnior, Ferreira Joel
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Daniel Augusto de Faria
dc.contributor.authorBatista, Victor Eduardo de Souza [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNoritomi, Pedro Yoshito
dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUSC - Universidade do Sagrado Coração
dc.contributor.institutionUNIFAL - Universidade Federal de Alfenas
dc.contributor.institutionRenato Archer Information Technology Center
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:16:55Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:16:55Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate different retention systems (cement-or screw-retained) and crown designs (non-splinted or splinted) of fixed implant-supported restorations, in terms of stress distributions in implants/components and bone tissue, by 3-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis. Four 3D models were simulated with the InVesalius, Rhinoceros 3D, and SolidWorks programs. Models were made of type III bone from the posterior maxillary area. Models included three 4.0-mm-diameter Morse taper (MT) implants with different lengths, which supported metal-ceramic crowns. Models were processed by the Femap and NeiNastran programs, using an axial force of 400 N and oblique force of 200 N. Results were visualized as the von Mises stress and maximum principal stress (smax). Under axial loading, there was no difference in the distribution of stress in implants/components between retention systems and splinted crowns; however, in oblique loading, cemented prostheses showed better stress distribution than screwed prostheses, whereas splinted crowns tended to reduce stress in the implant of the first molar. In the bone tissue cemented prostheses showed better stress distribution in bone tissue than screwed prostheses under axial and oblique loading. The splinted design only had an effect in the screwed prosthesis, with no influence in the cemented prosthesis. Cemented prostheses on MT implants showed more favorable stress distributions in implants/components and bone tissue. Splinting was favorable for stress distribution only for screwed prostheses under oblique loading.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Health Sciences University of Sacred Heart USC - Universidade do Sagrado Coração
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry UNIFAL - Universidade Federal de Alfenas
dc.description.affiliationRenato Archer Information Technology Center
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: #2014/02490-8
dc.format.extent30-35
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201801492
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Dental Journal, v. 29, n. 1, p. 30-35, 2018.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/0103-6440201801492
dc.identifier.fileS0103-64402018000100030.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1806-4760
dc.identifier.issn0103-6440
dc.identifier.scieloS0103-64402018000100030
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85038427734
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/175655
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Dental Journal
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,476
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCement-retained
dc.subjectDental implants
dc.subjectFinite element analysis
dc.subjectScrew-retained
dc.subjectSplinted
dc.titleRetention system and splinting on morse taper implants in the posterior maxilla by 3D finite element analysisen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentMateriais odontológicos e Prótese - FOApt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
S0103-64402018000100030.pdf
Tamanho:
1.86 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format