Publicação:
Quantified power Doppler as a predictor of delayed graft function after renal transplantation

dc.contributor.authorContti, Mariana Moraes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Paula Dalsoglio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorKojima, Cristiane Akemi [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNga, Hong Si [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCordeiro de Carvalho, Maria Fernanda [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorModelli de Andrade, Luis Gustavo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-21T13:08:50Z
dc.date.available2015-10-21T13:08:50Z
dc.date.issued2015-02-01
dc.description.abstractNo safe ultrasound (US) parameters have been established to differentiate the causes of graft dysfunction.To define US parameters and identify the predictors of normal graft evolution, delayed graft function (DGF), and rejection at the early period after kidney transplantation.Between June 2012 and August 2013, 79 renal transplant recipients underwent US examination 1-3 days posttransplantation. Resistive index (RI), power Doppler (PD), and RI + PD (quantified PD) were assessed. Patients were allocated into three groups: normal graft evolution, DGF, and rejection.Resistive index of upper and middle segments and PD were higher in the DGF group than in the normal group. ROC curve analysis revealed that RI + PD was the index that best correlated with DGF (cutoff = 0.84). In the high RI + PD group, time to renal function recovery (6.33 +/- A 6.5 days) and number of dialysis sessions (2.81 +/- A 2.8) were greater than in the low RI + PD group (2.11 +/- A 5.3 days and 0.69 +/- A 1.5 sessions, respectively), p = 0.0001. Multivariate analysis showed that high donor final creatinine with a relative risk (RR) of 19.7 (2.01-184.7, p = 0.009) and older donor age (RR = 1.17 (1.04-1.32), p = 0.007) correlated with risk DGF.Quantified PD (RI + PD) was the best DGF predictor. PD quantification has not been previously reported .en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Internal Med UNESP, BR-18618970 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Internal Med UNESP, BR-18618970 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.format.extent405-412
dc.identifierhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11255-014-0896-6
dc.identifier.citationInternational Urology And Nephrology, v. 47, n. 2, p. 405-412, 2015.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11255-014-0896-6
dc.identifier.issn0301-1623
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/128303
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000348995500029
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Urology And Nephrology
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.692
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,653
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectPower Doppleren
dc.subjectResistive indexen
dc.subjectAKIen
dc.subjectDelayed graft functionen
dc.subjectRenal transplantationen
dc.titleQuantified power Doppler as a predictor of delayed graft function after renal transplantationen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.springer.com/open+access/authors+rights?SGWID=0-176704-12-683201-0
dcterms.rightsHolderSpringer
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentClínica Médica - FMBpt

Arquivos