Publicação:
Manual Compared With Electric Vacuum Aspiration for Treatment of Molar Pregnancy

dc.contributor.authorPadron, Lilian
dc.contributor.authorRezende Filho, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorAmim Junior, Joffre
dc.contributor.authorSun, Sue Yazaki
dc.contributor.authorCharry, Rafael Cortes
dc.contributor.authorMaesta, Izildinha
dc.contributor.authorElias, Kevin M.
dc.contributor.authorHorowitz, Neil
dc.contributor.authorBraga, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorBerkowitz, Ross S.
dc.contributor.institutionFluminense Fed Univ
dc.contributor.institutionRio de Janeiro Fed Univ
dc.contributor.institutionSao Paulo Fed Univ
dc.contributor.institutionCent Univ Venezuela
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionBrigham & Womens Hosp
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T17:54:51Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T17:54:51Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-01
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To evaluate uterine evacuation of patients with molar pregnancy, comparing manual with electric vacuum aspiration. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with molar pregnancy followed at the Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center from January 2007 to December 2016. The individual primary study outcomes were incomplete uterine evacuation, uterine perforation, development of uterine synechia, and development of postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Secondary endpoints were other features of the perioperative outcomes (operative time, rate of transfusion, hemoglobin change, length of stay) and the clinical course of neoplasia (Prognostic Risk Score, presence of metastases, time to remission, and need for multiagent chemotherapy). RESULTS: Among 1,727 patients with molar pregnancy, 1,206 underwent electric vacuum aspiration and 521 underwent manual vacuum aspiration. After human chorionic gonadotropin normalization, patients with benign molar pregnancy were followed for 6 months and patients treated for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia were followed for 12 months. Baseline risk factors for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and demographic features were similar between the treatment groups. Uterine synechia developed less frequently after manual vacuum aspiration than after electric vacuum aspiration, 6 of 521 vs 63 of 1,206 (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.21, 95% CI 0.09-0.49), despite no differences in the occurrence of incomplete uterine evacuation, 65 of 521 vs 161 of 1,206 (adjusted OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.69-1.27), development of postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, 90 of 521 vs 171 of 1,206 (adjusted OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.96-1.67), or the need for multiagent chemotherapy, 22 of 521 vs 41 of 1,206 (adjusted OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73-1.28). CONCLUSION: Manual vacuum aspiration appears to be similar to electric vacuum aspiration for treatment of molar pregnancy and may be associated with less development of uterine synechia.en
dc.description.affiliationFluminense Fed Univ, Rio de Janeiro Trophoblast Dis Ctr, Postgrad Program Med Sci, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationRio de Janeiro Fed Univ, Postgrad Program Perinatal Hlth, Matern Sch, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo Fed Univ, Sao Paulo Hosp, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationCent Univ Venezuela, Caracas Univ Hosp, Caracas, Venezuela
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Botucatu Trophoblast Dis Ctr, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Botucatu Med Sch, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationBrigham & Womens Hosp, New England Trophoblast Dis Ctr, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, Dana Farber Canc Inst,Div Gynecol Oncol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Botucatu Trophoblast Dis Ctr, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Botucatu Med Sch, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)
dc.description.sponsorshipDonald P. Goldstein, MD Trophoblastic Tumor Registry Endowment
dc.description.sponsorshipDyett Family Trophoblastic Disease Research and Registry Endowment
dc.format.extent652-659
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002522
dc.identifier.citationObstetrics And Gynecology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 131, n. 4, p. 652-659, 2018.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/AOG.0000000000002522
dc.identifier.issn0029-7844
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/164512
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000441347800009
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofObstetrics And Gynecology
dc.relation.ispartofsjr2,563
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titleManual Compared With Electric Vacuum Aspiration for Treatment of Molar Pregnancyen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5875-7335[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentGinecologia e Obstetrícia - FMBpt

Arquivos