Atenção!


O atendimento às questões referentes ao Repositório Institucional será interrompido entre os dias 20 de dezembro de 2024 a 5 de janeiro de 2025.

Pedimos a sua compreensão e aproveitamos para desejar boas festas!

 

Community size can affect the signals of ecological drift and niche selection on biodiversity

dc.contributor.authorSiqueira, Tadeu [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSaito, Victor S.
dc.contributor.authorBini, Luis M.
dc.contributor.authorMelo, Adriano S.
dc.contributor.authorPetsch, Danielle K.
dc.contributor.authorLandeiro, Victor L.
dc.contributor.authorTolonen, Kimmo T.
dc.contributor.authorJyrkänkallio-Mikkola, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorSoininen, Janne
dc.contributor.authorHeino, Jani
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Jyväskylä
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Helsinki
dc.contributor.institutionWWF Finland
dc.contributor.institutionFreshwater Centre
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T01:24:05Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T01:24:05Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-01
dc.description.abstractEcological drift can override the effects of deterministic niche selection on small populations and drive the assembly of some ecological communities. We tested this hypothesis with a unique data set sampled identically in 200 streams in two regions (tropical Brazil and boreal Finland) that differ in macroinvertebrate community size by fivefold. Null models allowed us to estimate the magnitude to which β-diversity deviates from the expectation under a random assembly process while taking differences in richness and relative abundance into account, i.e., β-deviation. We found that both abundance- and incidence-based β-diversity was negatively related to community size only in Brazil. Also, β-diversity of small tropical communities was closer to stochastic expectations compared with β-diversity of large communities. We suggest that ecological drift may drive variation in some small communities by changing the expected outcome of niche selection, increasing the chances of species with low abundance and narrow distribution to occur in some communities. Habitat destruction, overexploitation, pollution, and reductions in connectivity have been reducing the size of biological communities. These environmental pressures might make smaller communities more vulnerable to novel conditions and render community dynamics more unpredictable. Incorporation of community size into ecological models should provide conceptual and applied insights into a better understanding of the processes driving biodiversity.en
dc.description.affiliationInstitute of Biosciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Avenida 24 A 1515
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Ciências Ambientais Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), Rodovia Washington Luis, km 235
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Ecologia ICB Universidade Federal de Goiás, Avenida Esperança s/n, Câmpus Samambaia
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Ecologia IB Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Bento Gonçalves 9500
dc.description.affiliationPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Av. Colombo 5790
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Botânica e Ecologia IB Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Bairro Boa Esperança
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Geosciences and Geography University of Helsinki, PO Box 64
dc.description.affiliationWWF Finland, Lintulahdenkatu 10
dc.description.affiliationFinnish Environment Institute Freshwater Centre, Paavo Havaksen Tie 3
dc.description.affiliationUnespInstitute of Biosciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Avenida 24 A 1515
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipAcademy of Finland
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: 001
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 13/50424-1
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 19/04033-7
dc.description.sponsorshipIdAcademy of Finland: 273557
dc.description.sponsorshipIdAcademy of Finland: 273560
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 304314/2014-5
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 307587/2017-7
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 465610/2014-5
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3014
dc.identifier.citationEcology, v. 101, n. 6, 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ecy.3014
dc.identifier.issn1939-9170
dc.identifier.issn0012-9658
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85085097906
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/198867
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEcology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectaquatic insects
dc.subjectcommunity assembly
dc.subjectdemographic stochasticity
dc.subjectdispersal
dc.subjectmetacommunities
dc.subjectnull models
dc.subjectβ-diversity deviation
dc.titleCommunity size can affect the signals of ecological drift and niche selection on biodiversityen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5069-2904[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3398-9399[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4515-8285[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9341-6050[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8583-3137[9]

Arquivos

Coleções