Publicação:
Does hormonal contraception during molar pregnancy follow-up influence the risk and clinical aggressiveness of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia after controlling for risk factors?

dc.contributor.authorSobral Dantas, Patricia Rangel [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMaesta, Izildinha [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRezende Filho, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorAmin Junior, Joffre
dc.contributor.authorElias, Kevin M.
dc.contributor.authorHoworitz, Neil
dc.contributor.authorBraga, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorBerkowitz, Ross S.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionBrazilian Assoc Gestat Trophoblast Dis
dc.contributor.institutionRio de Janeiro Fed Univ
dc.contributor.institutionHarvard Med Sch
dc.contributor.institutionFluminense Fed Univ
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T17:42:16Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T17:42:16Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-01
dc.description.abstractObjective. To evaluate the influence of hormonal contraception (HC) on the development and clinical aggressiveness of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) and the time for normalization of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted with women diagnosed with molar pregnancy, followed at the Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center, between January 2005 and January 2015. The occurrence of postmolar GTN and the time for hCG normalization between users of HC or barrier methods (BM) during the postmolar follow-up or GTN treatment were evaluated. Results. Among 2828 patients included in this study, 2680 (95%) used HC and 148 (5%) used BM. The use of HC did not significantly influence the occurrence of GTN (ORa: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.24-1.12, p = 0.060), despite different formulations: progesterone-only (ORa: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.29-1.01, p = 0.060) or combined oral contraception (COC) (ORa: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.27-1.01, p = 0.60) or with different dosages of ethinyl estradiol: 15 mcg (ORa, 1.33, 95% CI 0.79-2.24, p = 0.288), 20 mcg (ORa: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.64-1.65, p = 0.901), 30 mcg (ORa: 1.17, 95% Cl: 0.78-1.75, p = 0.437) or 35 mcg (ORa: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.42-1.39, p = 0.386). Time to hCG normalization weeks (ORa: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43-1.08, p = 0.071) or time to remission with chemotherapy 14 weeks (ORa: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43-1.09, p = 0.067) did not significantly differ among HC users when compared to patients using BM, when controlling for other risk factors using multivariate logistic regression. Conclusions. The use of HC during postmolar follow-up or GTN treatment does not seem to increase the risk of GTN or its severity and does not postpone the normalization of hCG levels. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Postgrad Program Gynecol Obstet & Mastol, Botucatu Med Sch, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationBrazilian Assoc Gestat Trophoblast Dis, Rio de Janeiro Trophoblast Dis Ctr, 180 Laranjeiras St, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationRio de Janeiro Fed Univ, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Matern Sch, Postgrad Program Perinatal Hlth, 180 Laranjeiras St, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationHarvard Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Reprod Biol, Div Gynecol Oncol,Brigham & Womens Hosp,Dana Far, New England Trophoblast Dis Ctr,Donald P Goldstei, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA USA
dc.description.affiliationFluminense Fed Univ, Postgrad Program Med Sci, Antonio Pedro Univ Hosp, Dept Maternal Child, 303 Marques do Parana St, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Postgrad Program Gynecol Obstet & Mastol, Botucatu Med Sch, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)
dc.description.sponsorshipDonald P. Goldstein MD Trophoblastic Tumor Registry Endowment
dc.description.sponsorshipDyett Family Trophoblastic Disease Research and Registry Endowment
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPERJ: E-26/112.070/2012
dc.format.extent364-370
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.09.007
dc.identifier.citationGynecologic Oncology. San Diego: Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science, v. 147, n. 2, p. 364-370, 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.09.007
dc.identifier.fileWOS000415663600022.pdf
dc.identifier.issn0090-8258
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/163500
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000415663600022
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofGynecologic Oncology
dc.relation.ispartofsjr2,339
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectMolar pregnancy
dc.subjectContraception
dc.subjectGestational trophoblastic neoplasia
dc.titleDoes hormonal contraception during molar pregnancy follow-up influence the risk and clinical aggressiveness of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia after controlling for risk factors?en
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dcterms.rightsHolderElsevier B.V.
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5875-7335[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2942-6182[7]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentGinecologia e Obstetrícia - FMBpt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
WOS000415663600022.pdf
Tamanho:
367.35 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição: