Publicação:
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in non-diabetic, pregnant Angolan women according to four diagnostic criteria and its effects on adverse perinatal outcomes

dc.contributor.authorDos Prazeres Tavares, Hamilton [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDos Santos, Débora Cristina Damasceno Meirelles [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAbbade, Joelcio Francisco [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNegrato, Carlos Antonio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDe Campos, Paulo Adão
dc.contributor.authorCalderon, Iracema Mattos Paranhos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRudge, Marilza Vieira Cunha [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity Agostinho Neto (UAN)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:04:04Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:04:04Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-22
dc.description.abstractBackground: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of risk factors for type 2 diabetes (Type2 DM) and cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and its prevalence varies based on region, population, and sex. Newborns of women with MetS have a greater risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. This study explores the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in non-diabetic, pregnant Angolan women and the adverse perinatal outcomes associated with it. Methods: This cross-sectional study collected the demographic, anthropometric and clinical data of 675 pregnant women in the maternity ward of General Hospital in Huambo, Angola. Metabolic syndrome was defined using four criteria: the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (ATPIII), the Joint Interim Statement (JIS), and definitions by both Bartha et al. and Chatzi et al. Results: The crude prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 36.6 % based on the JIS definition, 29.2 % based on NCEP ATPIII, 12.6 % based on Chatzi et al. and 1.8 % based on Bartha et al. In general, the prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes was 14.1 %. Conclusions: There was a high prevalence of metabolic syndrome, depending on the criteria used, and thus a great need to harmonize the criteria and cutoff points. Perinatal adverse outcomes were higher in pregnant women with metabolic syndrome.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics Botucatu Medical School UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics Medical School University Agostinho Neto (UAN)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics Botucatu Medical School UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-016-0139-3
dc.identifier.citationDiabetology and Metabolic Syndrome, v. 8, n. 1, 2016.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13098-016-0139-3
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-84977614397.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1758-5996
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84977614397
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/173193
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofDiabetology and Metabolic Syndrome
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,943
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAngola
dc.subjectMetabolic syndrome
dc.subjectPregnancy perinatal outcome
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.titlePrevalence of metabolic syndrome in non-diabetic, pregnant Angolan women according to four diagnostic criteria and its effects on adverse perinatal outcomesen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentGinecologia e Obstetrícia - FMBpt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
2-s2.0-84977614397.pdf
Tamanho:
825.42 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição: