Emergy assessment of tilapia cage farming in a hydroelectric reservoir

dc.contributor.authorGarcia, F.
dc.contributor.authorKimpara, J. M.
dc.contributor.authorValenti, W. C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAmbrosio, L. A.
dc.contributor.institutionGovt State Sao Paulo
dc.contributor.institutionEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T13:08:55Z
dc.date.available2014-12-03T13:08:55Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-01
dc.description.abstractConsidering that most of the energy supply in Brazil is derived from hydroelectric sources, the government has been strongly encouraging cage farming in federal water bodies. The government limited the aquaculture parks in hydroelectric reservoir to only 1% of its total area and, inside the parks, a ratio of 1:8 referring to the park and organic load dilution area. However, no objective evaluations proved that limit is suitable, and the absence of a methodology to evaluate this impact is a considerable problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Nile tilapia cage farming sustainability in a hydroelectric reservoir in Brazil using an emergy assessment and to simulate management techniques and public policies that contribute to the sustainability of this farming system. The results of the emergy assessment indicate that this production model has low renewability, is inefficient (mostly due to feeding), does not use local resources and presents high environmental impact. Therefore, we have analyzed three scenarios, in which reducing the inputs of non-renewable resources and enhancing environmental inputs were considered. Reducing the stocking density from 100 to 20 kg/m(3) in the initial farming stage and enhancing the dilution area from 1:8 to 1:100, referring to the cage and organic load dilution area, makes the current production system a sustainable model based on the use of natural renewable resources. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.affiliationGovt State Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo Agcy Agribusiness Technol, BR-15500970 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationEmbrapa Mid North, Brazilian Agr Res Corp, BR-64200970 Parnaiba, Piaui, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, BR-11330900 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationGovt State Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo Agcy Agribusiness Technol, BR-13460000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, BR-11330900 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2010/50154-6
dc.format.extent72-79
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.076
dc.identifier.citationEcological Engineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 68, p. 72-79, 2014.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.076
dc.identifier.issn0925-8574
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/111710
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000338611100010
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofEcological Engineering
dc.relation.ispartofjcr3.023
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,042
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectOreochromis niloticusen
dc.subjectSustainabilityen
dc.subjectPublic policiesen
dc.subjectStocking densityen
dc.titleEmergy assessment of tilapia cage farming in a hydroelectric reservoiren
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dcterms.rightsHolderElsevier B.V.
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8526-1052[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8354-8634[4]

Arquivos

Coleções