Combination of two desensitizing protocols to control dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial

dc.contributor.authorBarros, Antonia Patricia Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorde Melo Alencar, Cristiane [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Melo Pingarilho Carneiro, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorda Silva Pompeu, Danielle
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Gabriela Monteiro
dc.contributor.authorAraújo, Jesuína Lamartine Nogueira
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Cecy Martins
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:42:38Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:42:38Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study evaluated the effect of photobiomodulation (PBM) combined with 8% strontium acetate (SA8%) in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) in non-carious lesions and analyzed the risk factors with the patient’s quality of life. Methods: Eighty teeth with DH were randomly allocated into four treatment groups (n = 20): G1, PBM imitation + toothpaste with no active ingredient; G2, PBM imitation + toothpaste with SA8%; G3, PBM + toothpaste without the active ingredient; and G4, PBM + toothpaste with SA8%. Participants were provided with a questionnaire on the experience of dentin hypersensitivity (QEDH) to assess the impact of desensitizing treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQL). Friedman and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used for intra- and intergroup comparisons, and Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney tests were used to analyze HRQL. All analyses used significance levels of 5%. Results: Intergroup comparisons revealed a significant difference (p < 0.05); G4 had the best response in terms of HD reduction in G4 compared to the other groups on the 7th day of assessment (T3). Only G4 showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the reduction of EDH for intragroup analysis. Conclusion: The combination of therapies was more effective in reducing DH than the isolated use of these strategies. Clinical relevance: The combination of therapies is effective in the treatment of DH.en
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Dentistry Federal University of Pará, Pará
dc.description.affiliationAraraquara School of Dentistry Paulista State University, SP
dc.description.affiliationDental Materials Laboratory of the Postgraduate Program in Dentistry Federal University of Pará, Pará
dc.description.affiliationUnespAraraquara School of Dentistry Paulista State University, SP
dc.description.sponsorshipPró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação, Universidade Federal do Pará
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidade Federal do Pará
dc.format.extent1299-1307
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04104-2
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Investigations, v. 26, n. 2, p. 1299-1307, 2022.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-021-04104-2
dc.identifier.issn1436-3771
dc.identifier.issn1432-6981
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85111942105
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/222135
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Investigations
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDentin hypersensitivity
dc.subjectQuality of life
dc.subjectRisk factors
dc.subjectTherapy
dc.titleCombination of two desensitizing protocols to control dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions: a randomized, double-blind clinical trialen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7870-8848[7]

Arquivos

Coleções