Publicação:
Vitrification of bovine oocytes at different meiotic stages using the Cryotop method: Assessment of morphological, molecular and functional patterns

dc.contributor.authorSprícigo, J. F.W.
dc.contributor.authorMorais, K.
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, A. R.
dc.contributor.authorMachado, G. M.
dc.contributor.authorGomes, A. C.M.
dc.contributor.authorRumpf, R.
dc.contributor.authorFranco, M. M.
dc.contributor.authorDode, M. A.N.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Brasilia
dc.contributor.institutionEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionAnimal Reproduction Inc.
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:00:26Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:00:26Z
dc.date.issued2014-10-01
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to investigate the functional, morphological and molecular patterns of bovine oocytes vitrified at different times during in vitro maturation (IVM). Four groups of oocytes were used: non-vitrified control oocytes (CG), oocytes vitrified at 0. h (V0), oocytes vitrified after 8. h of IVM (V8) and oocytes vitrified after 22. h of IVM (V22). After vitrification, the oocytes were warmed and then returned to the incubator to complete a total of 24. h of IVM. To evaluate the effect of vitrification, the nuclear maturation and fertilization rates were assessed by lacmoid staining and ultrastructural electron microscopy. The cleavage and blastocyst rates were evaluated at D2, D7 and D8. The expression levels of CASP3, TP53, HDAC2, SUV39H1 and DNMT1 were investigated by RT-qPCR. The nuclear maturation, oocyte fertilization, cleavage and blastocyst rates were higher (P<. 0.05) in the CG group (80%; 81.3%; 88.5%; and 35.8%) than in the V0 (44%; 44.6%; 22.7%; and 2.6%), V8 (50%; 63%; 21.5%; and 2.2%) and V22 (55.5%; 66.9%; 24.1%; and 4.6%) groups. Ultrastructural analysis revealed significant damage within the cytoplasm of all vitrified groups, but more severe degeneration was observed in the V22 group. The gene expression profiles were not affected by vitrification (P>0.05). In conclusion, cytoplasm degeneration seems to be the most severe form of damage caused by vitrification. The use of the Cryotop method for vitrification severely reduces bovine oocyte viability regardless of whether it is performed at GV, GVBD or MII stage.en
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine University of Brasilia
dc.description.affiliationEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology Laboratory of Animal Reproduction
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Veterinary Medicine University of São Paulo State
dc.description.affiliationGeneal Animal Reproduction Inc.
dc.format.extent256-265
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2014.07.015
dc.identifier.citationCryobiology, v. 69, n. 2, p. 256-265, 2014.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cryobiol.2014.07.015
dc.identifier.issn1090-2392
dc.identifier.issn0011-2240
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84908018320
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/220239
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCryobiology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBovine
dc.subjectGene expression
dc.subjectUltrastructure
dc.subjectVitrification
dc.titleVitrification of bovine oocytes at different meiotic stages using the Cryotop method: Assessment of morphological, molecular and functional patternsen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções