Whitening toothpaste containing activated charcoal, blue covarine, hydrogen peroxide or microbeads: Which one is the most effective

dc.contributor.authorVaz, Vanessa Torraca Peraro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorJubilato, Dandara Proba [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Morgana Regina Mendonça de [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBortolatto, Janaina Freitas
dc.contributor.authorFloros, Michael Christopher
dc.contributor.authorDantas, Andrea Abi Rached [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOliveira Junior, Osmir Batista de [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionFaculty of Dentistry
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T16:15:01Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T16:15:01Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe efficacy of whitening toothpastes is questionable and controversial. Clinicians, patients and researchers have expressed concern with whitening toothpastes due to the risk of wearing the dental structure and the potential for disappointment if the advertised cosmetic results are not achieved. Objective: This study compared the whitening performance of toothpastes with different whitening technologies after initial and continued use. Material and Methods: Ninety bovine incisors were stained using a concentrated solution of black tea. They were randomly distributed into 6 groups, according to the toothpaste whitening technology: activated charcoal (B&W), blue covarine (WAD), hydrogen peroxide (LWA), microbeads (Oral B 3D White Perfection - 3DW) and optimized abrasives (XW4D). They were compared to a traditional toothpaste without a whitening agent (TA - control). Specimens underwent a brushing machine with controlled pressure, time and temperature. A calibrated examiner measured the color using a VITAClassical scale before the first brushing cycle (T0), after the first brushing cycle (TI), and after a brushing cycle that simulates continuous use (TCU). Whitening performance was evaluated by the difference of shades (ΔSGU) between T0-TI and T0-TCU timepoints, using the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s non-parametric test. The Wilcoxon test was used to evaluate the cumulative effect (α=0.05). fferences were observed between toothpastes in both TI and TCU (p<0.05). The time of use also had a significant effect (p<0.05). Conclusion: Only WAD and 3DW showed whitening performance after the first use (TI). The greatest whitening performance after continuous use was obtained by WAD, followed by LWA and 3DW. The use of conventional toothpaste (TA) promotes no tooth whitening. Clinical relevance: Microbead abrasives (3DW) and blue covarine (WAD) were the active technology tested that presented the best global tooth whitening performance.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara Departamento de Dentística Restauradora
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Toronto Faculty of Dentistry Department of Clinical Sciences - Restorative
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Toronto Faculty of Dentistry Department of Basic Sciences
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara Departamento de Dentística Restauradora
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0051
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Oral Science, v. 27.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0051
dc.identifier.fileS1678-77572019000100429.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1678-7765
dc.identifier.issn1678-7757
dc.identifier.lattes0170241211219616
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2153-9887
dc.identifier.scieloS1678-77572019000100429
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85060387063
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/188656
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Oral Science
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectActivated charcoal
dc.subjectOptical illusions
dc.subjectTooth bleaching
dc.subjectWhitening toothpaste
dc.titleWhitening toothpaste containing activated charcoal, blue covarine, hydrogen peroxide or microbeads: Which one is the most effectiveen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.author.lattes7460825090327014[6]
unesp.author.lattes00170241211219616[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-7362-4066[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9978-1606[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3928-1693[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6584-7136[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9539-0782[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8309-8837[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2153-9887[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8309-8837[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentOdontologia Restauradora - FOARpt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
S1678-77572019000100429.pdf
Tamanho:
397.65 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format