Is Nematocharax (Actinopterygii, Characiformes) a monotypic fish genus?

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura

Data

2016-10-01

Autores

Barreto, Silvia Britto
Nunes, Lorena Andrade
Silva, Andre Teixeira da [UNESP]
Juca-Chagas, Ricardo
Diniz, Debora
Sampaio, Iracilda
Schneider, Horacio
Antunes de Mello Affonso, Paulo Roberto

Título da Revista

ISSN da Revista

Título de Volume

Editor

Canadian Science Publishing, Nrc Research Press

Resumo

The combination of DNA barcodes and geometric morphometrics is useful to discriminate taxonomically controversial species, providing more precise estimates of biodiversity. Therefore, our goal was to assess the genetic and morphometric diversity in Nematocharax, a controversial monotypic and sexually dimorphic genus of Neotropical fish, based on sequencing of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and morphometric analyses in seven populations of N. venustus from coastal rivers in Brazil. The average pairwise intrapopulation divergence in COI ranged from 0 to 2.2%, while the average pairwise interpopulation divergence varied from 0 to 7.5%. The neighbour-joining (NJ) tree resulted in five genetic groups (bootstrap >= 97%), which correspond to the five clusters delimited by the BIN System, GMYC, and bPTP, indicating that there might be at least five species (or OTUs) within Nematocharax. Morphometric differences among these genetic lineages were also identified. Apparently, sexual selection, restricted dispersal, and geographic isolation might have acted synergistically to cause the evolutionary split of populations. These data challenge the current view that Nematocharax is a monotypic genus inasmuch as evolutionarily significant units or even distinguished species were identified. Therefore, we recommend that the highly impacted coastal basins in northeastern Brazil should be prioritized in conservation plans.

Descrição

Palavras-chave

COI, DNA barcoding, ichthyofauna, geometric morphometrics, species delimitation

Como citar

Genome. Ottawa: Canadian Science Publishing, Nrc Research Press, v. 59, n. 10, p. 851-865, 2016.

Coleções