Surface smoothness of resin composites after polishing—A systematic review and network meta-analysis of in vitro studies

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira, Ananda Gomes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Rafael Santos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSpinola, Manuela da Silva
dc.contributor.authorBatista, Graziela Ribeiro
dc.contributor.authorBresciani, Eduardo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCaneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionBraz Cubas University
dc.contributor.institutionA. T. Still University
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-29T16:05:40Z
dc.date.available2023-07-29T16:05:40Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-01
dc.description.abstractA systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed to provide evidence for the best polishing protocol for different types of resin composites to minimize surface roughness. A search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, BBO, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library on July 2, 2019 (updated in December, 2020). In vitro studies that included at least two systems for polishing resin composites and analyzed surface roughness were included. The risk of bias was evaluated. A random-effects Bayesian-mixed treatment comparison model was used to compare surface roughness in resin composites with the different types of polishers. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis was performed to rank the probability for the best polishing system. After removal of duplicates, title and abstract screening yielded 34 studies. Network meta-analysis was not possible for hybrid and microhybrid composites. SUCRA analysis showed that abrasive paper discs allowed greater surface smoothness for nanohybrid and nanofill composites to a probability of between 83% and 91.6%. Silicon carbide brush had a 78.2% probability of being the best system for microfill composites. The use of abrasive paper disc polishers showed a favorable result in nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites. Silicon carbide brush has a greater chance of promoting a smoother surface for microfill resin composites.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Braz Cubas University, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Missouri School of Dentistry and Oral Health A. T. Still University, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University, São Paulo
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eos.12921
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 131, n. 2, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/eos.12921
dc.identifier.issn1600-0722
dc.identifier.issn0909-8836
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85148011814
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/249655
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Oral Sciences
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectcomposite resins
dc.subjectdental polishing
dc.subjectnetwork meta-analysis
dc.subjectpermanent dental restoration
dc.titleSurface smoothness of resin composites after polishing—A systematic review and network meta-analysis of in vitro studiesen
dc.typeResenha
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1324-1033[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8794-2716[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9915-5173[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1328-8181[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9299-8792[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0521-7922[6]

Arquivos

Coleções

Artigos - Odontologia Restauradora - ICT