Implant prosthodontics: In vitro testing methods

dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Erika O.
dc.contributor.authorJúnior, Amilcar Freitas
dc.contributor.authorDelben, Juliana A.
dc.contributor.authorValverde, Guilherme B.
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Nelson R. F. A.
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Eduardo P. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCoelho, Paulo G.
dc.contributor.institutionNew York University College of Dentistry
dc.contributor.institutionNew York University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T07:14:13Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T07:14:13Z
dc.date.issued2012-10-01
dc.description.abstractWhile randomized controlled clinical studies are strongly suggested as the optimal approach to evaluate the performance of biomaterials and design aspects of dental implants and prosthetic components, these studies are at times not economically viable. Thus, well designed in vitro studies associating virtual models via finite element analysis (FEA) and appropriate in vitro laboratory mechanical testing should be utilized as preliminary investigative tools to reduce the number of clinical studies that are needed to fully characterize the performance of a given implant-restorative system. The present chapter describes the computer simulation using FEA and in vitro tests as single-load-to-failure, staircase and step-stress accelerated life-testing utilized to evaluate implant-restoration systems with emphasis to the advantages and potential limitations of each methodology and how the acquired outcomes can be related to the clinical scenario. Major issues and approaches related to the FEA, such as model creation, finite element software, material properties, bone-implant interface, mesh and convergence of the analyses, boundary and loading condition, validation and interpretation of FE modeling and criteria to interpret the results in FEA studies are listed and described. © 2012 by Nova Science Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biomaterials and Biomimetics New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Prosthodontics College of Dentistry New York University, New York, NY
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University Araçatuba School of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University Araçatuba School of Dentistry
dc.format.extent133-163
dc.identifier.citationImplant Dentistry Research Guide: Basic, Translational and Clinical Research, p. 133-163.
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84895844750
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/227606
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofImplant Dentistry Research Guide: Basic, Translational and Clinical Research
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleImplant prosthodontics: In vitro testing methodsen
dc.typeCapítulo de livro
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentMateriais odontológicos e Prótese - FOApt

Arquivos