Publicação:
Can quantitative wood anatomy data coupled with machine learning analysis discriminate CITES species from their look-alikes?

dc.contributor.authorLiu, Shoujia
dc.contributor.authorHe, Tuo
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jiajun
dc.contributor.authorChen, Jiabao
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Juan
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Xiaomei
dc.contributor.authorWiedenhoeft, Alex C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorYin, Yafang
dc.contributor.institutionChinese Academy of Forestry
dc.contributor.institutionUSDA Forest Service
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Wisconsin
dc.contributor.institutionPurdue University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionMississippi State University
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-01T20:25:42Z
dc.date.available2023-03-01T20:25:42Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractDue to increasing global trade of timber commodities and illegal logging activities, wood species listed in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) appendices are facing extinction, and their international trade has been banned or is under supervision. Reliable and applicable species-level discrimination methods have become urgent to protect global forest resources and promote the legal trade of timbers. This study aims to discriminate CITES-listed species from their look-alikes in international trade using quantitative wood anatomy (QWA) data coupled with machine learning (ML) analysis. Herein, the QWA data of 14 CITES-listed species and 15 of their look-alike species were collected from microscope slide collection, and four ML classifiers, J48, Multinomial Naïve Bayes, Random Forest, and SMO, were used to analyze the QWA data. The results indicated that ML classifiers exhibited better performance than traditional wood identification methods. Specifically, Multinomial Naïve Bayes outperformed other classifiers, and successfully discriminated CITES-listed Pterocarpus species from their look-alike species with an accuracy of 95.83%. Furthermore, the discrimination accuracy was affected by the combinations of wood anatomical features, and combinations with fewer features included could result in higher accuracy at the species level. In conclusion, the QWA data coupled with ML analysis could unlock the potential of wood anatomy to discriminate CITES species from their look-alikes for forensic applications.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Wood Anatomy and Utilization Research Institute of Wood Industry Chinese Academy of Forestry
dc.description.affiliationWood Collections Chinese Academy of Forestry
dc.description.affiliationCenter for Wood Anatomy Research Forest Products Laboratory USDA Forest Service
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Botany University of Wisconsin
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Forestry and National Resources Purdue University
dc.description.affiliationCiências Biológicas (Botânica) Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Sustainable Biomaterials Mississippi State University
dc.description.affiliationUnespCiências Biológicas (Botânica) Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00226-022-01404-y
dc.identifier.citationWood Science and Technology.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00226-022-01404-y
dc.identifier.issn1432-5225
dc.identifier.issn0043-7719
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85135798152
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/240628
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofWood Science and Technology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleCan quantitative wood anatomy data coupled with machine learning analysis discriminate CITES species from their look-alikes?en
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2217-1367[2]

Arquivos

Coleções