Publicação:
Patient-reported outcomes

dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Bradley C.
dc.contributor.authorPatrick, Donald L.
dc.contributor.authorDevji, Tahira
dc.contributor.authorMaxwell, Lara J.
dc.contributor.authorBingham, Clifton O.
dc.contributor.authorBeaton, Dorcas E.
dc.contributor.authorBoers, Maarten
dc.contributor.authorBriel, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorBusse, Jason W.
dc.contributor.authorCarrasco-Labra, Alonso
dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Robin
dc.contributor.authorDa Costa, Bruno R.
dc.contributor.authorDib, Regina El [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLyddiatt, Anne
dc.contributor.authorOstelo, Raymond W.
dc.contributor.authorShea, Beverley
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Jasvinder
dc.contributor.authorTerwee, Caroline B.
dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, Paula R.
dc.contributor.authorGagnier, Joel J.
dc.contributor.authorTugwell, Peter
dc.contributor.authorGuyatt, Gordon H.
dc.contributor.institutionDalhousie University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Washington
dc.contributor.institutionMcMaster University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Ottawa
dc.contributor.institutionJohns Hopkins University
dc.contributor.institutionInstitute for Work & Health
dc.contributor.institutionVrije Universiteit Amsterdam
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Basel
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
dc.contributor.institutionBispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital
dc.contributor.institutionSt. Michael’s Hospital
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionIngersoll
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Liverpool
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Michigan
dc.contributor.institutionOttawa Hospital Research Institute
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T10:24:00Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T10:24:00Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.description.abstractAuthors of systematic reviews that include patient-reported outcomes (PROs) should have a good understanding of how patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are developed, including the constructs they are intended to measure, their reliability, validity and responsiveness. This chapter describes the category of outcomes known as PROs and their importance for healthcare decision making, and illustrates the key issues related to reliability, validity and responsiveness that systematic review authors should consider when including PROs. It also addresses the structure and content of PROs and provides guidance for combining information from different PROs. The chapter outlines a step-by-step approach to addressing each of these elements in the systematic review process. The focus is on the use of PROs in randomized trials, and what is crucial in this context when selecting PROs to include in a meta-analysis. The chapter describes PROMs in more detail and discusses some issues to consider when deciding which PROMs to address in a review.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology Dalhousie University
dc.description.affiliationHealth Services and Epidemiology University of Washington
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact (HEI) McMaster University
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Ottawa
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Rheumatology Johns Hopkins University
dc.description.affiliationInstitute for Work & Health
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Clinical Research University of Basel
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Anesthesia McMaster University
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral and Craniofacial Health Science University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
dc.description.affiliationMusculoskeletal Statistics Unit The Parker Institute Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital
dc.description.affiliationApplied Health Research Centre St. Michael’s Hospital
dc.description.affiliationInstitute of Science and Technology UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista
dc.description.affiliationIngersoll
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Medicine Ottawa Hospital Research Institute School of Epidemiology and Public Health University of Ottawa
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biostatistics University of Liverpool
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Epidemiology University of Michigan
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Medicine & School of Epidemiology and Public Health Faculty of Medicine University of Ottawa
dc.description.affiliationClinical Epidemiology Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
dc.description.affiliationUnespInstitute of Science and Technology UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista
dc.format.extent479-492
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604.ch18
dc.identifier.citationCochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, p. 479-492.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/9781119536604.ch18
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85101436911
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/205945
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectHealthcare decision making
dc.subjectMeta-analysis
dc.subjectPatient-reported outcome measures
dc.subjectPatient-reported outcomes
dc.subjectRandomized trials
dc.subjectSystematic review authors
dc.subjectSystematic review process
dc.titlePatient-reported outcomesen
dc.typeCapítulo de livro
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções