Effect of ELVAX polymer subgingival implants with echistatin on extracted and reimplanted rats’ teeth

dc.contributor.authorPinheiro, Bethânia Camargo
dc.contributor.authorPinheiro, Tiago Novaes
dc.contributor.authorLeite, Milena Gomes Melo
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Roberto Brandão
dc.contributor.authorBernardineli, Norberti
dc.contributor.authorFaria, Flávio Duarte [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCintra, Luciano Tavares Angelo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBramante, Clovis Monteiro
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionDental School of Amazonas State University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-29T16:11:29Z
dc.date.available2023-07-29T16:11:29Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractTo investigate the effect of ELVAX polymer subgingival implants incorporated with echistatin peptide on incisor reimplanted tooth in rats. Forty-two male Wistars rats were divided into two groups: echistatin-treated rats (E) and control rats (C). The animals had their right maxillary incisors extracted and treated according to the International Association of Dental Traumatology replantation protocol. The extra-alveolar dry period was 30 and 60 min, and the post-surgical experimental periods were 15, 60, and 90 days. The samples were stained with H&E and analyzed for the presence of an inflammatory response, incidence of resorptions, and dental ankylosis. Results were statistically analyzed (p < 0.05). The presence of inflammatory resorption was significantly higher in group C at 30 and 60 min extra-alveolar time, in the 15-day postoperative period as compared with the E group (p < 0.05). Dental ankylosis was significantly more prevalent in group E in 30 min extra-alveolar time and 15 days postoperative period (p < 0.05). However, in 60 min extra-alveolar time and 60 days postoperative period, dental ankylosis was more prevalent in C group (p < 0.05). The use of ELVAX subgingival implants with echistatin demonstrated therapeutic potential in preventing the experimental resorption process after replantation of maxillary incisors in rats.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dentistry Endodontics and Dental Materials Bauru School of Dentistry University of São Paulo, SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine Dental School of Amazonas State University, AM
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (Unesp), José Bonifácio, 1193, Vila Mendonça, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (Unesp), José Bonifácio, 1193, Vila Mendonça, SP
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-023-00814-z
dc.identifier.citationOdontology.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10266-023-00814-z
dc.identifier.issn1618-1255
dc.identifier.issn1618-1247
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85153036214
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/249873
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofOdontology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEchistatin
dc.subjectRoot resorption
dc.subjectTooth avulsion
dc.titleEffect of ELVAX polymer subgingival implants with echistatin on extracted and reimplanted rats’ teethen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2348-7846[7]

Arquivos