Post-exercise Hypotension Following a Single Bout of High Intensity Interval Exercise vs. a Single Bout of Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise in Adults With or Without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
dc.contributor.author | Marçal, Isabela Roque [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Goessler, Karla Fabiana | |
dc.contributor.author | Buys, Roselien | |
dc.contributor.author | Casonatto, Juliano | |
dc.contributor.author | Ciolac, Emmanuel Gomes [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Cornelissen, Véronique A. | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
dc.contributor.institution | KU Leuven | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade de São Paulo (USP) | |
dc.contributor.institution | University of Northern Paraná | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-01T06:02:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-05-01T06:02:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-06-28 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Post-exercise hypotension (PEH) is an important tool in the daily management of patients with hypertension. Varying the exercise parameters is likely to change the blood pressure (BP) response following a bout of exercise. In recent years, high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) has gained significant popularity in exercise-based prevention and rehabilitation of clinical populations. Yet, to date, it is not known whether a single session of HIIE maximizes PEH more than a bout of moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE). Objective: To compare the effect of HIIE vs. MICE on PEH by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search in the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, and SPORTDiscus was conducted from the earliest date available until February 24, 2020. Randomized clinical trials comparing the transient effect of a single bout of HIIE to MICE on office and/or ambulatory BP in humans (≥18 years) were included. Data were pooled using random effects models with summary data reported as weighted means and 95% confidence interval (CIs). Results: Data from 14 trials were included, involving 18 comparisons between HIIE and MICE and 276 (193 males) participants. The immediate effects, measured as office BP at 30- and 60-min post-exercise, was similar for a bout of HIIE and MICE (p > 0.05 for systolic and diastolic BP). However, HIIE elicited a more pronounced BP reduction than MICE [(−5.3 mmHg (−7.3 to −3.3)/ −1.63 mmHg (−3.00 to −0.26)] during the subsequent hours of ambulatory daytime monitoring. No differences were observed for ambulatory nighttime BP (p > 0.05). Conclusion: HIIE promoted a larger PEH than MICE on ambulatory daytime BP. However, the number of studies was low, patients were mostly young to middle-aged individuals, and only a few studies included patients with hypertension. Therefore, there is a need for studies that involve older individuals with hypertension and use ambulatory BP monitoring to confirm HIIE's superiority as a safe BP lowering intervention in today's clinical practice. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020171640). | en |
dc.description.affiliation | Exercise and Chronic Disease Research Laboratory Department of Physical Education School of Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP) | |
dc.description.affiliation | Research Group for Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Department of Rehabilitation Sciences University of Leuven KU Leuven | |
dc.description.affiliation | Applied Physiology and Nutrition Research Group School of Physical Education and Sport Faculty of Medicine (FMUSP) University of Saõ Paulo | |
dc.description.affiliation | Research Group in Physiology and Physical Activity University of Northern Paraná | |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Exercise and Chronic Disease Research Laboratory Department of Physical Education School of Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP) | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) | |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.675289 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Frontiers in Physiology, v. 12. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fphys.2021.675289 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1664-042X | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85109938571 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233258 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Frontiers in Physiology | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | ambulatory blood pressure | |
dc.subject | high intensity interval exercise | |
dc.subject | hypotension | |
dc.subject | moderate intensity aerobic exercise | |
dc.subject | office blood pressure | |
dc.subject | post-exercice | |
dc.subject | systematic review & meta-analysis | |
dc.title | Post-exercise Hypotension Following a Single Bout of High Intensity Interval Exercise vs. a Single Bout of Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise in Adults With or Without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials | en |
dc.type | Resenha | |
unesp.department | Educação Física - FC | pt |