Post-exercise Hypotension Following a Single Bout of High Intensity Interval Exercise vs. a Single Bout of Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise in Adults With or Without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

dc.contributor.authorMarçal, Isabela Roque [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGoessler, Karla Fabiana
dc.contributor.authorBuys, Roselien
dc.contributor.authorCasonatto, Juliano
dc.contributor.authorCiolac, Emmanuel Gomes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCornelissen, Véronique A.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionKU Leuven
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Northern Paraná
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-01T06:02:18Z
dc.date.available2022-05-01T06:02:18Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-28
dc.description.abstractBackground: Post-exercise hypotension (PEH) is an important tool in the daily management of patients with hypertension. Varying the exercise parameters is likely to change the blood pressure (BP) response following a bout of exercise. In recent years, high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) has gained significant popularity in exercise-based prevention and rehabilitation of clinical populations. Yet, to date, it is not known whether a single session of HIIE maximizes PEH more than a bout of moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE). Objective: To compare the effect of HIIE vs. MICE on PEH by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search in the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, and SPORTDiscus was conducted from the earliest date available until February 24, 2020. Randomized clinical trials comparing the transient effect of a single bout of HIIE to MICE on office and/or ambulatory BP in humans (≥18 years) were included. Data were pooled using random effects models with summary data reported as weighted means and 95% confidence interval (CIs). Results: Data from 14 trials were included, involving 18 comparisons between HIIE and MICE and 276 (193 males) participants. The immediate effects, measured as office BP at 30- and 60-min post-exercise, was similar for a bout of HIIE and MICE (p > 0.05 for systolic and diastolic BP). However, HIIE elicited a more pronounced BP reduction than MICE [(−5.3 mmHg (−7.3 to −3.3)/ −1.63 mmHg (−3.00 to −0.26)] during the subsequent hours of ambulatory daytime monitoring. No differences were observed for ambulatory nighttime BP (p > 0.05). Conclusion: HIIE promoted a larger PEH than MICE on ambulatory daytime BP. However, the number of studies was low, patients were mostly young to middle-aged individuals, and only a few studies included patients with hypertension. Therefore, there is a need for studies that involve older individuals with hypertension and use ambulatory BP monitoring to confirm HIIE's superiority as a safe BP lowering intervention in today's clinical practice. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020171640).en
dc.description.affiliationExercise and Chronic Disease Research Laboratory Department of Physical Education School of Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationResearch Group for Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Department of Rehabilitation Sciences University of Leuven KU Leuven
dc.description.affiliationApplied Physiology and Nutrition Research Group School of Physical Education and Sport Faculty of Medicine (FMUSP) University of Saõ Paulo
dc.description.affiliationResearch Group in Physiology and Physical Activity University of Northern Paraná
dc.description.affiliationUnespExercise and Chronic Disease Research Laboratory Department of Physical Education School of Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.675289
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Physiology, v. 12.
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fphys.2021.675289
dc.identifier.issn1664-042X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85109938571
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/233258
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Physiology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectambulatory blood pressure
dc.subjecthigh intensity interval exercise
dc.subjecthypotension
dc.subjectmoderate intensity aerobic exercise
dc.subjectoffice blood pressure
dc.subjectpost-exercice
dc.subjectsystematic review & meta-analysis
dc.titlePost-exercise Hypotension Following a Single Bout of High Intensity Interval Exercise vs. a Single Bout of Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise in Adults With or Without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trialsen
dc.typeResenha
unesp.departmentEducação Física - FCpt

Arquivos