Stress distribution in ceramic restorations over natural tooth using sing finite element analysis. lithium disilicate x aluminum oxide material

dc.contributor.authorJúnior, Amilcar Chagas Freitas [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Eduardo Passos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDos Santos, Paulo Henrique [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDe Almeida, Erika Oliveira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDe Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorJúnior, Manoel Martín [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorArchangelo, Carlos Marcelo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T07:26:17Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T07:26:17Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Data on stress distribution in tooth-restoration interface with different ceramic restorative materials are limited. The aim of this chapter was to assess the stress distribution in the interface of ceramic restorations with laminate veneer or full-coverage crown with two different materials (lithium dissilicate and densely sintered aluminum oxide) under different loading areas through finite element analysis. Materials and Methods: Six two-dimensional finite element models were fabricated with different restorations on natural tooth: laminate veneer (IPS Empress, IPS Empress Esthetic and Procera AllCeram) or full-coverage crown (IPS e.max Press and Procera AllCeram). Two different loading areas (L) (50N) were also determined: palatal surface at 45° in relation to the long axis of tooth (L1) and perpendicular to the incisal edge (L2). A model with higid natural tooth was used as control. von Mises equivalent stress (δ<inf>vM</inf>) and maximum principal stress (δ<inf>max</inf>) were obtained on Ansys software. Results: The presence of ceramic restoration increased δ<inf>vM</inf> and δ<inf>max</inf> in the adhesive interface, mainly for the aluminum oxide (Procera AllCeram system) restorations. The full-coverage crowns generated higher stress in the adhesive interface under L1 while the same result was observed for the laminate veneers under L2. Conclusions: Lithium dissilicate and densely sintered aluminum oxide restorations exhibit different behavior due to different mechanical properties and loading conditions.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, 1560 Waldir Feliozola de Moraes
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, 1560 Waldir Feliozola de Moraes
dc.format.extent43-55
dc.identifier.citationClinical Dentistry Research Compendium, p. 43-55.
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84934783663
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/228003
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Dentistry Research Compendium
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBiomechanics
dc.subjectCeramics
dc.subjectCrowns
dc.subjectFinite element analysis
dc.titleStress distribution in ceramic restorations over natural tooth using sing finite element analysis. lithium disilicate x aluminum oxide materialen
dc.typeCapítulo de livro
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentMateriais odontológicos e Prótese - FOApt

Arquivos