Epidural Corticosteroid Injections for Sciatica

dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Crystian B. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMaher, Christopher G.
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Manuela L.
dc.contributor.authorHancock, Mark J.
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Vinicius Cunha
dc.contributor.authorMcLachlan, Andrew J.
dc.contributor.authorKoes, Bart W.
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Paulo H.
dc.contributor.authorCohen, Steven P.
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Rafael Z.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Sydney
dc.contributor.institutionMacquarie Univ
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
dc.contributor.institutionErasmus MC
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Southern Denmark
dc.contributor.institutionJohns Hopkins Univ
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T12:38:11Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T12:38:11Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-01
dc.description.abstractStudy Design. Systematic with meta-analysis Objectives. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of epidural corticosteroid injections compared with placebo injection in reducing leg pain and disability in patients with sciatica. Summary of Background Data. Conservative treatments, including pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments, are typically the first treatment options for sciatica but the evidence to support their use is limited. The overall quality of evidence found by previous systematic reviews varies between moderate and high, which suggests that future trials may change the conclusions. New placebo-controlled randomized trials have been published recently which highlights the importance of an updated systematic review. Methods. The searches were performed without language restrictions in the following databases from 2012 to 25 September 2019: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and trial registers. We included placebo-controlled randomized trials investigating epidural corticosteroid injections in patients with sciatica. The primary outcomes were leg pain intensity and disability. The secondary outcomes were adverse events, overall pain, and back pain intensity. We grouped similar trials according to outcome measures and their respective follow-up time points. Short-term follow-up (>2 weeks but <= 3 months) was considered the primary follow-up time point due to the expected mechanism of action of epidural corticosteroid injection. Weighted mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RRs) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. We assessed the overall quality of evidence using the GRADE approach and conducted the analyses using random effects. Results. We included 25 clinical trials (from 29 publications) providing data for a total of 2470 participants with sciatica, an increase of six trials when compared to the previous review. Epidural corticosteroid injections were probably more effective than placebo in reducing short-term leg pain (MD -4.93, 95% CI -8.77 to -1.09 on a 0-100 scale), short-term disability (MD -4.18, 95% CI: -6.04 to -2.17 on a 0-100 scale) and may be slightly more effective in reducing short-term overall pain (MD -9.35, 95% CI -14.05 to -4.65 on a 0-100 scale). There were mostly minor adverse events (i.e., without hospitalization) after epidural corticosteroid injections and placebo injections without difference between groups (RR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.91-1.42). The quality of evidence was at best moderate mostly due to problems with trial design and inconsistency. Conclusion. A review of 25 placebo-controlled trials provides moderate-quality evidence that epidural corticosteroid injections are effective, although the effects are small and short-term. There is uncertainty on safety due to very low-quality evidence.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Physiotherapy, Presidente Prudente, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Inst Bone & Joint Res, Kolling Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
dc.description.affiliationMacquarie Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Discipline Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW, Australia
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Vales Jequitinhonha & Mucuri UFVJM, Dept Physiotherapy, Diamantina, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sydney, Fac Pharm, Sydney, NSW, Australia
dc.description.affiliationErasmus MC, Dept Gen Practice, Rotterdam, Netherlands
dc.description.affiliationUniv Southern Denmark, Ctr Muscle & Joint Hlth, Odense, Denmark
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW, Australia
dc.description.affiliationJohns Hopkins Univ, Blaustein Pain Treatment Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Baltimore, MD USA
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Dept Physiotherapy, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Physiotherapy, Presidente Prudente, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.format.extentE1405-E1415
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003651
dc.identifier.citationSpine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 45, n. 21, p. E1405-E1415, 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/BRS.0000000000003651
dc.identifier.issn0362-2436
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/210050
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000619513800007
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofSpine
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectadrenal cortex hormones
dc.subjectepidural
dc.subjectinjections
dc.subjectplacebos
dc.subjectsciatica
dc.titleEpidural Corticosteroid Injections for Sciaticaen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderLippincott Williams & Wilkins
unesp.departmentFisioterapia - FCTpt

Arquivos