Biocompatibility of primers and an adhesive used for implant-retained maxillofacial prostheses: An in vitro analysis

dc.contributor.authorBonatto, Liliane da Rocha [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGoiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFreitas da Silva, Emily Vivianne [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPenha Oliveira, Sandra Helena [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorHaddad, Marcela Filie
dc.contributor.authorChaves Neto, Antonio Hernandes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBalera Brito, Victor Gustavo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Daniela Micheline dos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Fed Alfenas
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T17:34:46Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T17:34:46Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-01
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem. Implant-retained maxillofacial prostheses should be biocompatible, regardless of the primers and adhesives used to bond the acrylic resin and facial silicone. The authors are unaware of any study evaluating the influence of these primers and adhesives on the biocompatibility of maxillofacial prostheses. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of primers and an adhesive used to bond acrylic resin and facial silicone during the fabrication of implant-retained maxillofacial prostheses. Material and methods. Twenty-eight circular specimens made of resin and silicone were fabricated, either bonded or nonbonded with primer and adhesive. The specimens were divided into 7 groups: resin; silicone; resin+silastic medical adhesive type A+silicone; resin+DC 1205 primer silicone; resin+Sofreliner primer+silicone; resin+DC 1205 primer+silastic medical adhesive type A+silicone; and resin+Sofreliner primer+silastic medical adhesive type A+silicone. Eluates of the materials tested were prepared by setting 4 specimens of each experimental group in Falcon tubes with medium and incubating at 37 degrees C for 24 hours. The eluate cytotoxicity was evaluated by an assay of survival/proliferation ((314,5-dimethylthiazol-2-y1)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide [MTT] test) in cultures of human keratinotytes. The levels of IL1, IL6, TNF alpha, and the chemokine MIP-1 alpha. were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The mRNA expressions for MMP-9, TGF-beta, and collagen type IV were analyzed by the regtime polymerase chain reaction. Data were submitted to analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc tests (alpha=.05). Results. An increased cell proliferation was observed for the RAS group, with statistically significant differences (P<.001) compared with the unstimulated group. The RDCpS group showed the highest IL6 concentration values (P<.001). No significant statistical difference was found in the relative quantification of mRNA for collagen type IV, MMP9, or TGF beta between the groups (P>.05). Conclusions. The RAS group showed the highest cell proliferation percentage, while the RDCpS group exhibited the highest IL6 concentration values. No detectable levels of iL beta, TNF alpha, or CCL3/MIP1 alpha were observed. The tested materials showed no toxic effects on the HaCaT cell line.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Basic Sci, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Alfenas, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Alfenas, MG, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Basic Sci, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipBrazilian National Research Council
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2012/02907-0
dc.description.sponsorshipIdBrazilian National Research Council: 305555/2013-8
dc.format.extent799-805
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Prosthetic Dentistry. New York: Mosby-elsevier, v. 117, n. 6, p. 799-805, 2017.
dc.identifier.fileWOS000403197400018.pdf
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913
dc.identifier.lattes9719883814872582
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/162873
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000403197400018
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Prosthetic Dentistry
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,087
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titleBiocompatibility of primers and an adhesive used for implant-retained maxillofacial prostheses: An in vitro analysisen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dcterms.rightsHolderElsevier B.V.
unesp.author.lattes9719883814872582
unesp.author.lattes1743697225702984[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6481-5506[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentCiências Básicas - FOApt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
WOS000403197400018.pdf
Tamanho:
814.12 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição: