Publicação:
Efficacy and Safety of Topical or Oral Hydrolyzed Collagen in Women with Dermatoporosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Factorial Design Study

dc.contributor.authorGuadanhim, Lilia R. S.
dc.contributor.authorMiot, Hélio A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSoares, Juliana L. M.
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Silas A. M.
dc.contributor.authorLeonardi, Gislaine R.
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Renato D.
dc.contributor.authorBagatin, Ediléia
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionDuke University Medical Center
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-29T13:33:57Z
dc.date.available2023-07-29T13:33:57Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Dermatoporosis defines the progressive chronic cutaneous insufficiency syndrome. Stage I is characterized by cutaneous atrophy, senile purpura, and stellate pseudoscars. Objective: To assess clinical, histologic, quality of life, and biophysical effects of oral and/or topical hydrolyzed collagen (HC) on forearm skin of postmenopausal women with Dermatoporosis stage I. Methods: Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled factorial design study. Two groups of menopausal women with stage I dermatoporosis on forearms were randomized to oral HC 5 g/day or matching placebo, and also to topical serum 2.5% HC or matching placebo once a day, for 6 months. Results: A total of 56 women, age range 60–93 years (mean 69.5 ± 7.3 years) were included. Comparing data from baseline and after 6 months, no significant difference was observed for each intervention nor their comparison, for all efficacy parameters: clinical and quality of life scores, dermal elasticity, thickness and echogenicity, and histologic and immunohistochemical markers (p > 0.1). Limitations: Larger studies to confirm our findings are warranted. Conclusions: In menopausal women with stage I dermatoporosis, oral or topical collagen peptides used alone or in combination do not have benefits on forearm skin after 6 months of intervention, and therefore should not be used routinely in this population. Graphical Abstract: CONSORT flow chart [Figure not available: see fulltext.].en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dermatology Universidade Federal de São Paulo/UNIFESP, Rua Botucatu, 821 - 5o andar
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dermatology Universidade Estadual de São Paulo/UNESP
dc.description.affiliationFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences Universidade Estadual de Campinas/UNICAMP
dc.description.affiliationDivision of Cardiology Duke University Medical Center
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dermatology Universidade Estadual de São Paulo/UNESP
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidade Federal de São Paulo
dc.format.extent523-534
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-022-00859-y
dc.identifier.citationDermatology and Therapy, v. 13, n. 2, p. 523-534, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13555-022-00859-y
dc.identifier.issn2190-9172
dc.identifier.issn2193-8210
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85144646223
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/248079
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofDermatology and Therapy
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCollagen peptides
dc.subjectCutaneous atrophy
dc.subjectDermatoporosis
dc.subjectHydrolyzed collagen
dc.subjectPhotoaging
dc.subjectSenile purpura
dc.titleEfficacy and Safety of Topical or Oral Hydrolyzed Collagen in Women with Dermatoporosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Factorial Design Studyen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4144-1366[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2596-9294[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4017-4913[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1584-747X[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7126-1326[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2999-4961[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-7190-8241[7]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentDermatologia e Radioterapia - FMBpt

Arquivos