Reproducibility of Running Anaerobic Sprint Test for soccer players

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorDe Andrade, Vitor L.
dc.contributor.authorPereira Santiago, Paulo R.
dc.contributor.authorKalva Filho, Carlos A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorZapaterra Campos, Eduardo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPapoti, Marcelo
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T15:29:19Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T15:29:19Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Although the Running Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST) presents reliability when performed on firmer surfaces (i.e. athletic track), its application on less rigid surfaces can compromise the measure determinations. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the RAST reliability for soccer players performing on grass, and wearing soccer cleats. METHODS: Fourteen soccer players (16 +/- 1 years, 72.3 +/- 10.3 kg, 177.2 +/- 8.4 cm, 14.5 +/- 5.3% of fat mass, and VO2MAX of 52.0 5.1 mL.kg-1.min-1) performed six maximal 35-meter effort interspersed by 10s of passive rest (RAST). After 48h the RAST was repeated to test the reliability. The main variables analyzed were the peak power (PP), mean power (MP), fatigue indexes (FI), and impulse (ImP). The reproducibility of test and re-test was tested through the Student's t Test to paired samples, intraclass correlation (ICC), typical error (TE), and coefficient of variation (CV%). RESULTS: The PP (test=701.4 +/- 169.5 W; re-test 712.4 +/- 142.3 W), MP (test=538.6 +/- 111.4 W; re-test=551.9 101.1 W), and the ImP (test=2841.2 +/- 461.8 N.s; re-test=2797.2 +/- 575.9 N.s) were not different, presented significant correlation between the. situations (ICC=0.88; 0.96 e 0.93; respectively), and low values of TE (71.9 W; 30.6 W e 191.1 N.s, respectively) and CV% (10.2%; 5.9% e 6.8%, respectively). The FI (test=40.1 +/- 5.8; re-test=38.7 +/- 7.7%) were not significantly related between the test and re-test, and presented high TE (5.7%) and CV% (14.4%). CONCLUSIONS: We can conclude that RAST presents high reliability when performed on grass with soccer cleats, just as rigid surfaces. Besides, the ImP is more robust than the.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sao Paulo, Fac Med Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sao Paulo, Sch Phys Educ & Sport Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Phys Educ, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Phys Educ, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2010/08761-2
dc.format.extent34-38
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Sports Medicine And Physical Fitness. Turin: Edizioni Minerva Medica, v. 56, n. 1-2, p. 34-38, 2016.
dc.identifier.issn0022-4707
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/158822
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000374717100005
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherEdizioni Minerva Medica
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Sports Medicine And Physical Fitness
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,477
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectSoccer
dc.subjectExercise
dc.subjectAnaerobic threshold
dc.titleReproducibility of Running Anaerobic Sprint Test for soccer playersen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderEdizioni Minerva Medica
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9356-3683[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3702-7149[5]

Arquivos

Coleções

Artigos