Shear bond strength of three diferent bonding systems for orthodontic brackets

dc.contributor.authorLon, Luís Filipe Siu [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorKnop, Luegya Amorim Henriques [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorShintcovsk, Ricardo Lima [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFilho, Odilon Guariza
dc.contributor.authorRaveli, Dirceu Barnabé [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionPontificial Catholic University of Paraná
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T16:53:59Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T16:53:59Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01
dc.description.abstractAim: The objective of this study was to compare the efficiencies of different adhesive systems used to bond orthodontic brackets as well as the fracture pattern during debonding on bovine teeth. Methods: The sample included 45 specimens assigned to 3 groups according to the adhesive system applied: Group I: Transbond XT (3M Unitek®, Monrovia/CA - USA), Group II: Orthocem (FGM® Joinville/ SC-BR), and Group III: Orthobond (Morelli®, Sorocaba/SP - BR). For this purpose, metal brackets were bonded to bovine teeth following the instructions from each manufacturer. The specimens were subjected to a shear test to assess bond strength (BS). Finally, after debonding, the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was estimated. Results: The average shear strength for a tooth bonded using the adhesive system Transbond XT was 16.39 MPa, while it was 18.08 Mpa for Orthocem and 7.28 Mpa for Orthobond; The Tukey test revealed no statistically significant differences between groups I and II (p < 0.01) and group III differed statistically from groups I and II. Conclusion: In conclusion, both adhesive systems Transbond XT and Orthocem attained higher bond strength values than Orthobond; the fracture pattern was similar for all adhesive systems applied.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Orthodontics São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationGraduate Program in Orthodontics School of Health and Biosciences Pontificial Catholic University of Paraná
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Orthodontics São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Dentistry
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.20396/BJOS.V17I0.8652883
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 17.
dc.identifier.doi10.20396/BJOS.V17I0.8652883
dc.identifier.issn1677-3225
dc.identifier.issn1677-3217
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85055639844
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/189842
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDental bonding
dc.subjectDental enamel
dc.subjectShear strength
dc.titleShear bond strength of three diferent bonding systems for orthodontic bracketsen
dc.typeArtigo

Arquivos