Publicação:
Outcomes of two surgical techniques using silicone rod for frontalis sling suspension to treat severe ptosis

dc.contributor.authorGalindo-Ferreiro, Alicia
dc.contributor.authorAkaishi, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorHanafi, Somaya
dc.contributor.authorKhandekar, Rajiv
dc.contributor.authorGalvez-Ruiz, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorSchellini, Silvana [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Augusto
dc.contributor.institutionKing Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital
dc.contributor.institutionComplejo Asistencial de Palencia
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:09:41Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:09:41Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare outcomes of two techniques of frontalis silicone sling surgery. Methods: This retrospective, nonrandomized chart review was performed on patients undergoing frontalis sling surgery between 2008 and 2011. Silicone rods were sutured to the tarsal plate through an eyelid crease incision (open method) or stab incisions (closed method). Data were collected on age, gender, type of surgery, preoperative and postoperative margin reflex distance (MRD), and complications. A successful outcome was defined as a postoperative score of 2 to 4 for MRD or an improvement in MRD. Results: A total of 155 eyelids of 146 patients with ptosis were included. There were 60 patients in the open method group and 85 patients in the closed method group, respectively. Successful outcomes were seen in 30 (50%) patients in the open method and 44 (51.8%) patients in the closed method groups. There were 61 (71.8%) patients in the open method group and 45 (75%) patients in the closed method group who had improved MRD at last follow-up. The main complications were exposure keratitis, eyelash ptosis, and eyelid crease abnormalities that occurred only in the closed method group. Conclusions: The silicone frontalis sling procedure had the same success rates in both the open and closed methods. Eyelash and eyelid crease abnormalities were unique to the closed method.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oculoplasty King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Research King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Ophthalmology Complejo Asistencial de Palencia
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Ophthalmology Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto-University of São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Ophthalmology Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu - UNESP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Ophthalmology Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu - UNESP
dc.format.extent52-58
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20160929-01
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, v. 54, n. 1, p. 52-58, 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.3928/01913913-20160929-01
dc.identifier.issn1938-2405
dc.identifier.issn0191-3913
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85011673737
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/174173
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,474
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleOutcomes of two surgical techniques using silicone rod for frontalis sling suspension to treat severe ptosisen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentOftalmologia, Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço - FMBpt

Arquivos