Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Environmental and economic impacts of different sugarcane production systems in the ethanol biorefinery

dc.contributor.authorChagas, Mateus F.
dc.contributor.authorBordonal, Ricardo O. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCavalett, Otavio
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Joao Luis N.
dc.contributor.authorBonomi, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorLa Scala, Newton [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionCNPEM
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-27T08:16:27Z
dc.date.available2018-11-27T08:16:27Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01
dc.description.abstractEconomic and environmental impacts of ethanol biorefineries with different sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) production technologies are evaluated with a focus on harvesting systems, reduced tillage, controlled traffic farming to reduce soil compaction, and alternatives of sugarcane rotation. Results showed that scenarios with sunn hemp (Crotolaria juncea) as a rotation crop in the sugarcane cycle present great potential to decrease environmental impacts of sugarcane biorefineries. Although reduced tillage promotes a reduction in sugarcane production costs in comparison to conventional tillage, it only cause a slightly decrease (less than 5%) on ethanol environmental impacts. Use of soybean (Glycine max) as a rotation crop yields an extra source of income, increasing the net agricultural revenues by 15% compared to scenario with sunn hemp. However, better economic and environmental impacts for sugarcane biorefinery are obtained with use of sunn hemp in the crop rotation and controlled traffic farming. Sugarcane production using controlled traffic farming allows an increased number of harvesters, with consequent reduction of 43% in greenhouse gases emissions, 24% in fossil depletion, and 44% in acidification potential when compared to burned cane scenario. These results reinforce that better agricultural management practices should be used to maximize number of cuts in the sugarcane cycle. (c) 2015 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltden
dc.description.affiliationCNPEM, CTBE, Campinas, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2010/17139-3
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2008/58187-0
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 142232/2012-2
dc.format.extent89-106
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1623
dc.identifier.citationBiofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining-biofpr. Hoboken: Wiley-blackwell, v. 10, n. 1, p. 89-106, 2016.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/bbb.1623
dc.identifier.issn1932-104X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/165050
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000368839900017
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relation.ispartofBiofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining-biofpr
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectsunn hemp
dc.subjectcrotalaria
dc.subjectsoybean
dc.subjectreduced tillage
dc.subjectcontrolled traffic farming
dc.titleEnvironmental and economic impacts of different sugarcane production systems in the ethanol biorefineryen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html
dcterms.rightsHolderWiley-Blackwell
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.departmentCiências Exatas - FCAVpt

Arquivos