Judo athletes' perceptions of two training models

dc.contributor.authorOlivio Junior, Jose Alfredo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTavares Junior, Antonio Carlos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOlivia, Aline
dc.contributor.authorDos-Santos, Julio Wilson [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDrigo, Alexandre Janotta [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionAnhanguera Univ
dc.contributor.institutionGold Kimono Project
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T12:40:29Z
dc.date.available2019-10-04T12:40:29Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-12
dc.description.abstractBackground & Study Aim: Training process planning and application is, first and foremost, the result of coach's thinking. Subjective measures of training loads are useful tools which should be used with confidence by coaches. The aim of study the knowledge about judo athletes' perceptions, after two different training models, of the following indicators: motivation, pleasure, fatigue, understanding, competitive specificity, physical fitness, tactical-technical preparation, randori variability, creativity, problem-solving and general evolution. Material & Methods: Twenty-four athletes from the U-18 (n = 14) and U-21 (n = 10) were randomly separated into two groups of 12 subjects. For two weeks, each group underwent both training models: Traditional Training (TT) and Functional Units Training (FUT). After the two weeks, an interview was conducted in order to collect athletes' perceptions of both training models regarding each indicator. Results: Study participants considered that FUT was more efficient in the following categories: motivation; pleasure; understanding; competitive specificity; technical-tactical preparation, randori variability; creativity; problemsolving and general evolution, while TT was perceived as superior in the other two categories analysed: fatigue and physical fitness. Conclusions: After the two training processes, study participants considered FUT to be the most effective model for judo training.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ Unesp, Lab & Res Grp Exercise Physiol Appl Sports Traini, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ Unesp, Sch Sci Bauru, Dept Phys Educ, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ Unesp, Post Grad Program Movement Sci Univ, Rio Claro, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationAnhanguera Univ, Leme, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationGold Kimono Project, Araras, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ Unesp, Lab & Res Grp Exercise Physiol Appl Sports Traini, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ Unesp, Sch Sci Bauru, Dept Phys Educ, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ Unesp, Post Grad Program Movement Sci Univ, Rio Claro, Brazil
dc.format.extent135-141
dc.identifier.citationArchives Of Budo Science Of Martial Arts And Extreme Sports. Warsaw: Archives Budo Science Martial Arts & Extreme Sports, v. 14, p. 135-141, 2018.
dc.identifier.issn2300-8822
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/186012
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000480299100001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherArchives Budo Science Martial Arts & Extreme Sports
dc.relation.ispartofArchives Of Budo Science Of Martial Arts And Extreme Sports
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectcombat sports
dc.subjectovertraining syndrome
dc.subjectperformance
dc.subjecttraining loads
dc.titleJudo athletes' perceptions of two training modelsen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderArchives Budo Science Martial Arts & Extreme Sports
unesp.departmentEducação Física - FCpt

Arquivos