Inflammatory response and macrophage polarization using different physicochemical biomaterials for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction

dc.contributor.authorMunerato, Marcelo Salles
dc.contributor.authorBiguetti, Claudia Cristina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorParra da Silva, Raquel Barroso [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues da Silva, Ana Claudia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorZucon Bacelar, Ana Carolina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLima da Silva, Jordan
dc.contributor.authorRondina Couto, Maira Cristina
dc.contributor.authorHúngaro Duarte, Marco Antônio
dc.contributor.authorSantiago-Junior, Joel Ferreira
dc.contributor.authorBossini, Paulo Sérgio
dc.contributor.authorMatsumoto, Mariza Akemi [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionSagrado Coração University – USC
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionResearch and Education Center for Phototherapy in Health Science (Nupen)
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T00:59:29Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T00:59:29Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-01
dc.description.abstractKnowledge about the action of immune system in the recognition of biomaterials has been extremely helpful when it comes about understanding host response and biomaterials' fate in human body. This study aimed to investigate inflammatory response and macrophage polarization during bone healing process of rat's calvaria critical defects using different bone materials in order to evaluate their influence on bone repair and on the quality of the newly formed bone tissue. Eighty male albinus Wistar rats underwent surgical procedure for the confectioning of a 5-mm diameter bone defect in their right parietal bone, and divided in four groups (n = 20 each), according the biomaterial: AG – Control, particulate intramembranous autogenous bone graft, HA/TCP – particulate biphasic calcium phosphate with HA/TCP (60/40), DBB – particulate deproteinized bovine bone, VC – particulate bioactive vitroceramic. After 3, 7, 21, and 45 days, the specimens were removed and prepared for microcomputed tomography (microCT), light and polarized microscopy, immunohistochemical analysis, and histomorphometry. No significant differences were detected considering percentage of leukocytes among the groups and periods, as well as in relation to immunolabeling for inflammatory (M1) and reparative (M2) macrophages. However, immunolabeling for bone marker indicated a delayed osteoblast differentiation in VC group, resulting in a decrease in mineralized bone matrix parameters in this group, revealed by microCT. In addition, AG and HA/TCP presented a satisfactory bone collagenous content. Despite the distinct origins and physicochemical properties of the tested biomaterials, they presented similar immune-inflammatory responses in the present experimental model, influencing bone-related proteins and bone quality, which must be considered according to their use.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Health Sciences Sagrado Coração University – USC, Rua Irmã Arminda 10-50
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Basic Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Dentistry, Rua José Bonifácio 1193
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dentistry Endodontics and Dental Materials Bauru School of Dentistry University of São Paulo – FOB/USP, Al. Octávio Pinheiro Brisola, 9-75
dc.description.affiliationResearch and Education Center for Phototherapy in Health Science (Nupen), Rua Pedro Fernandes Alonso, 766, Jardim Alvorada
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Basic Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Dentistry, Rua José Bonifácio 1193
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 03762-7
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2016
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110229
dc.identifier.citationMaterials Science and Engineering C, v. 107.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.msec.2019.110229
dc.identifier.issn1873-0191
dc.identifier.issn0928-4931
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85074763939
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/198112
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMaterials Science and Engineering C
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBiomaterials
dc.subjectBone substitutes
dc.subjectMacrophages
dc.subjectOsteoimmunology
dc.subjectRats
dc.titleInflammatory response and macrophage polarization using different physicochemical biomaterials for oral and maxillofacial reconstructionen
dc.typeArtigo

Arquivos

Coleções