Effect of electric, ultrasonic and manual toothbrushes on biofilm removal and gingivitis control: in vitro and parallel randomized controlled clinical trial study

dc.contributor.authorCirelli, Thamiris [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNogueira, Andressa Vilas Boas [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRibaldo, Isis Jordão Pinheiro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFuruta, Emilly Yukiko Diz [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCirelli, Joni Augusto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T10:53:50Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T10:53:50Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractAim: To evaluate the effect of manual (M), electric (E) and ultrasonic (US) toothbrushes on the removal of oral biofilm and control of gingivitis. Also, the roughness and tooth wear production were evaluated in vitro. Methods: For the in vitro analyses, thirty bovine dentin specimens were submitted to a 3-month brushing simulation (9 minutes) with the three types of toothbrushes (n = 10). Subsequently, a randomized controlled clinical trial was performed with 36 patients divided into 3 groups according to the toothbrushes used (n = 12). Gingival index, visible plaque index and the volume of crevicular fluid were evaluated at baseline and 3 months after the beginning of the toothbrush use. Furthermore, the performance of the biofilm removal per brushing cycle of 1 and 3 minutes with each toothbrush was made monthly until the end of the experiment. Results: The US group had the highest dentin wear. Clinically, the US group had a lower plaque index at 3 months than the M group. The M group also showed less biof lm removal efficiency from the second month of follow-up and more worn bristles at the end of the 3 month period than the E and US groups. Conclusion: The ultrasonic, electric and manual toothbrushes showed no differences in gingivitis control in the present study. The ultrasonic and electric toothbrushes had a more significant effect on biofilm removal than a manual toothbrush, but the ultrasonic toothbrush promoted greater dentin tissue wear.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery São Paulo State University – UNESP School of Dentistry at Araraquara
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery São Paulo State University – UNESP School of Dentistry at Araraquara
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.format.extent1-13
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8659280
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 20, p. 1-13.
dc.identifier.doi10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8659280
dc.identifier.issn1677-3225
dc.identifier.issn1677-3217
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85101603818
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/207356
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectGingivitis
dc.subjectOral hygiene
dc.subjectToothbrushing.
dc.titleEffect of electric, ultrasonic and manual toothbrushes on biofilm removal and gingivitis control: in vitro and parallel randomized controlled clinical trial studyen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0521-0205[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8778-0115[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2756-5947[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7082-9290[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentDiagnóstico e Cirurgia - FOARpt

Arquivos