Photoelastic analysis of the influence of residual ridge inclination in conjugated class i mandibular prostheses with different attachment systems

dc.contributor.authorFerraço, Renato [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTonella, Bianca Piccolotto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFalcón-Antenucci, Rosse Mary [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVerri, Fellippo Ramos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDekon, Stefan Fiuza de Carvalho [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGoiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:29:05Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:29:05Z
dc.date.issued2013-05-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution in mandibular free-end removable partial dentures (RPD) associated with FPD in the abutment teeth considering different inclinations of the residual ridge: (1) horizontal and (2) distal descending ridges and two designs of free-end RPD with different attachment systems were tested: (1) clasp and (2) system ERA. Methods. Axial loads (100 N) were applied on the teeth of the RPD. The images were recorded and the stress distribution was evaluated through photoelastic fringes. Results. In general, the distal descending ridge presented more photoelastic fringes in the region of the roots of the abutment teeth while the horizontal ridge exhibited higher compression in the base of the prosthesis. In the horizontal ridge, the denture with clasp presented more favourable stress distribution than the denture with the system ERA. In the distal descending ridge, the denture with the system ERA relieved the region of the abutment teeth and overloaded the residual ridge. Conclusion: The horizontal ridge presented more favourable performance; the dentures with clasp exhibited better performance for both ridges evaluated; the denture with the system ERA presented better results in the distal descending ridge. © 2013 Informa Healthcare.en
dc.description.affiliationAraçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University-UNESP, Rua José Bonifácio 1193, Araçatuba/São Paulo, 16015-050
dc.description.affiliationUnespAraçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University-UNESP, Rua José Bonifácio 1193, Araçatuba/São Paulo, 16015-050
dc.format.extent984-988
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.741697
dc.identifier.citationActa Odontologica Scandinavica, v. 71, n. 3-4, p. 984-988, 2013.
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/00016357.2012.741697
dc.identifier.issn0001-6357
dc.identifier.issn1502-3850
dc.identifier.lattes5581364193525500
dc.identifier.lattes3215571441204704
dc.identifier.lattes9719883814872582
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3800-3050
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84877245811
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/75308
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000322832200088
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofActa Odontologica Scandinavica
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.522
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,706
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,706
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBiomechanics
dc.subjectPrecision attachment
dc.subjectProsthodontics
dc.titlePhotoelastic analysis of the influence of residual ridge inclination in conjugated class i mandibular prostheses with different attachment systemsen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://informahealthcare.com/userimages/ContentEditor/1255620309227/Copyright_And_Permissions.pdf
unesp.author.lattes5581364193525500
unesp.author.lattes3215571441204704
unesp.author.lattes9719883814872582
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3800-3050[7]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentMateriais odontológicos e Prótese - FOApt

Arquivos