Maximum inhibitory dilution of mouthwashes containing chlorhexidine and polyhexamethylene biguanide against salivary Staphylococcus aureus

dc.contributor.authorNascimento, Andresa Piacezzi
dc.contributor.authorTanomaru, Juliane Maria Guerreiro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMatoba Jr., Fumio
dc.contributor.authorWatanabe, Evandro
dc.contributor.authorTanomaru-Filho, Mario [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorIto, Izabel Yoko
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T20:44:39Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T20:44:39Z
dc.date.issued2008-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of the present study was to determine the in vitro maximum inhibitory dilution (MID) of two chlorhexidine-based oral mouthwashes (CHX): Noplak®, Periogard®, and one polyhexamethylene biguanide-based mouthwash (PHMB): Sanifill Premium® against 28 field Staphylococcus aureus strains using the agar dilution method. Materials and Methods: For each product, decimal dilutions ranging from 1/10 to 1/655,360 were prepared in distilled water and added to Mueller Hinton Agar culture medium. After homogenization, the culture medium was poured onto Petri dishes. Strains were inoculated using a Steers multipoint inoculator and dishes were incubated at 37°C for 24hours. For reading, MID was considered as the maximum dilution of the mouthwash still capable of inhibiting microbial growth. Results: Sanifill Premium® inhibited the growth of all strains at 1/40 dilution and of 1 strain at 1/80 dilution. Noplak® inhibited the growth of 23 strains at 1/640 dilution and of all 28 strains at 1/320 dilution. Periogard® showed inhibited growth of 7 strains at 1/640 dilution and of all 28 strains at 1/320 dilution. Data were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis statistical test, showing significant differences between the mouthwashes evaluated (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between Noplak® and Periogard® p>0.05). Sanifill Premium® was the least effective (p<0.05). Conclusion: It was concluded that CHX-based mouthwashes present better antimicrobial activity against S. Aureus than the PHMB-based mouthwash.en
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo USP, Ribeirão Preto, SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Araraquara School of Dentistry São Paulo State University, Araraquara, SP
dc.description.affiliationRibeirão Preto School of Dentistry University of São Paulo USP, Ribeirão Preto, SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Microbiology School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo USP, Ribeirão Preto, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Araraquara School of Dentistry São Paulo State University, Araraquara, SP
dc.format.extent336-339
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000500006
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Oral Science, v. 16, n. 5, p. 336-339, 2008.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1678-77572008000500006
dc.identifier.issn1678-7765
dc.identifier.issn1678-7757
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-54349084832
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/225309
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Oral Science
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnti-infective agents
dc.subjectBacteria
dc.subjectChlorhexidine
dc.titleMaximum inhibitory dilution of mouthwashes containing chlorhexidine and polyhexamethylene biguanide against salivary Staphylococcus aureusen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentOdontologia Restauradora - FOARpt

Arquivos