Sodium fluoride effect on erosion-abrasion under hyposalivatory simulating conditions

dc.contributor.authorScaramucci, Taís
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Alessandra B.
dc.contributor.authorLippert, Frank
dc.contributor.authorFrank, Nathaniel E.
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, T.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:29:55Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:29:55Z
dc.date.issued2013-07-04
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To investigate the effect of fluoride (0, 275 and 1250 ppm F; NaF) in combination with normal and low salivary flow rates on enamel surface loss and fluoride uptake using an erosion-remineralization-abrasion cycling model. Design: Enamel specimens were randomly assigned to 6 experimental groups (n = 8). Specimens were individually placed in custom made devices, creating a sealed chamber on the enamel surface, connected to a peristaltic pump. Citric acid was injected into the chamber for 2 min followed by artificial saliva at 0.5 (normal flow) or 0.05 (low flow) ml/min, for 60 min. This cycle was repeated 4×/day, for 5 days. Toothbrushing with abrasive suspensions containing fluoride was performed for 2 min (15 s of actual brushing) 2×/day. Surface loss was measured by optical profilometry. KOH-soluble fluoride and enamel fluoride uptake were determined after the cycling phase. Data were analysed by two-way ANOVA. Results: No significant interactions between fluoride concentration and salivary flow were observed for any tested variable. Low caused more surface loss than normal flow rate (p < 0.01). At both flow rates, surface loss for 0 was higher than for 275, which did not differ from 1250 ppm F. KOH-soluble and structurally-bound enamel fluoride uptake were significantly different between fluoride concentrations with 1250 > 275 > 0 ppm F (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Sodium fluoride reduced enamel erosion/abrasion, although no additional protection was provided by the higher concentration. Higher erosion progression was observed in low salivary flow rates. Fluoride was not able to compensate for the differences in surface loss between flow rates. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.06.004
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Oral Biology.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.06.004
dc.identifier.issn0003-9969
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84879538839
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/75914
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000325236600023
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Oral Biology
dc.relation.ispartofjcr2.050
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,752
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDentifrice
dc.subjectEnamel erosion
dc.subjectFluoride
dc.subjectOptical profilometry
dc.subjectSalivary flow rate
dc.titleSodium fluoride effect on erosion-abrasion under hyposalivatory simulating conditionsen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy

Arquivos

Coleções