A randomized clinical trial evaluating Photodithazine-mediated Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy as a treatment for Denture stomatitis
dc.contributor.author | Alves, Fernanda | |
dc.contributor.author | Carmello, Juliana Cabrini [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Alonso, Gabriela Caroline [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Mima, Ewerton Garcia de Oliveira [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Bagnato, Vanderlei Salvador | |
dc.contributor.author | Pavarina, Ana Cláudia [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade de São Paulo (USP) | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-25T10:36:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-25T10:36:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-12-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: This randomized clinical trial assessed antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy (aPDT) mediated by Photodithazine (PDZ) to treat patients with denture stomatitis (DS). Methodologies: Patients with DS were randomly assigned to the groups: aPDT (n = 30) and nystatin (NYS, n = 35). aPDT patients received 6 aPDT sessions, three times a week for 15 days, which involved PDZ (200 mg/L) topical application (20 min) on the palate and upper denture, followed by LED illumination (660 nm, 50 J/cm²). NYS patients were instructed to rinse one dropper of this medication for one minute, four times a day, for 15 days. Microbiological collections of dentures and palates were performed and cultured on blood agar and CHROMAgar Candida. Microbial viability was determined, and photographs of the palates were taken for clinical evaluation. Data were analyzed by Repeated Measure Linear Model and Bonferroni (p ≤ 0.05). Results: aPDT was more effective to reduce the total microbiota than NYS. At the end of the treatments, aPDT reduced 1.98 from the palate and 1.91 log10 from the denture, while NYS reduced 0.05 and 0.17 log10, respectively. Moreover, aPDT was as effective as NYS to reduce Candida. Reductions of 0.68 and 0.77 log10 were observed in the palate and denture of aPDT group, while reductions of 0.57 and 1.43 log10 were achieved in the NYS group, respectively. Regarding to oral lesion, 53.3 and 54.2 % of the patients from aPDT and NYS groups had clinical improvement. However, the recurrence of DS was observed in both groups. Conclusion: PDZ-mediated aPDT is a promising treatment for DS. | en |
dc.description.affiliation | Biophotonics Lab Group of Optics Physics Institute of São Carlos University of São Paulo - USP, Av. Trabalhador São-carlense, 400 | |
dc.description.affiliation | Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Dentistry, Araraquara, Rua Humaitá, 1680 | |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Dentistry, Araraquara, Rua Humaitá, 1680 | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) | |
dc.description.sponsorshipId | FAPESP: 2013/07276-1 | |
dc.description.sponsorshipId | FAPESP: 2014/01262-1 | |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102041 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, v. 32. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102041 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1873-1597 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1572-1000 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85092476041 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206657 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Antimicrobial photochemotherapy | |
dc.subject | Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy | |
dc.subject | Candida | |
dc.subject | Oral candidiasis | |
dc.title | A randomized clinical trial evaluating Photodithazine-mediated Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy as a treatment for Denture stomatitis | en |
dc.type | Artigo | |
unesp.campus | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquara | pt |
unesp.department | Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese - FOAR | pt |