Forest loss and fragmentation can promote the crowding effect in a forest-specialist primate

dc.contributor.authorGestich, Carla C.
dc.contributor.authorArroyo-Rodríguez, Víctor
dc.contributor.authorSaranholi, Bruno H.
dc.contributor.authorda Cunha, Rogério G. T.
dc.contributor.authorSetz, Eleonore Z. F.
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Milton C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México
dc.contributor.institutionImperial College London
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Alfenas
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:44:07Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:44:07Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractContext: Forest loss and fragmentation are rapidly expanding across the tropics. Although forest loss is a major driver of the current biodiversity crisis, the effect of fragmentation remains debated, particularly for forest-specialist species. Objectives: We evaluated the univariate and combined effect of forest loss (percent of forest cover) and fragmentation (forest patch density) on populations of a forest-specialist primate, the black-fronted titi monkey (Callicebus nigrifrons), in the landscapes from a transitional zone between Atlantic Forest and Cerrado biomes. Methods: We surveyed titi monkey density in 14 landscapes. Using a multiscale and multimodel inference approach, we tested the relative effect of each landscape variable assessed at their respective scales of effect on titi monkey density. Results: Titi monkey density ranged from 0 to 12 groups/km2 and was best predicted by the combined effect of forest cover and patch density. Density increased in forest patches embedded in more deforested and fragmented landscapes. Interestingly, the effect of forest patch density was consistently positive along the entire evaluated forest cover gradient (9–42%). Conclusions: Our findings support that fragmentation per se can have positive effects on biodiversity, in this case, by increasing the likelihood that more individuals can be ‘rescued’ from deforestation and crowded in the remaining forest patches. Although the long-term consequences of living crowded in forest patches are unknown, a conservative approach for preserving this (and potentially other) forest-specialist species could be to promote forest restoration projects focused on increasing the number and/or size of forest patches in the landscape (i.e., reverse fragmentation).en
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Biologia Animal Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Genética e Evolução Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Road Washington Luís km 235, SP
dc.description.affiliationInstituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Michoacán
dc.description.affiliationEscuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Yucatán
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Life Sciences Imperial College London
dc.description.affiliationInstituto de Ciências da Natureza Universidade Federal de Alfenas, MG
dc.description.affiliationLaboratório de Ecologia Espacial e Conservação (LEEC) Departamento de Ecologia Universidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespLaboratório de Ecologia Espacial e Conservação (LEEC) Departamento de Ecologia Universidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP, SP
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdea Wild
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: 001
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2012/14245-2
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2013/24453-4
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2013/50421-2
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2020/01779-5
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 312045/2013-1
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 312292/2016-3
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 442147/2020-1
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: 88881.068425/2014-1
dc.description.sponsorshipIdIdea Wild: GESTBRAZ0510
dc.description.sponsorshipIdNatural Environment Research Council: NE/S011811/1
dc.format.extent147-157
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01336-1
dc.identifier.citationLandscape Ecology, v. 37, n. 1, p. 147-157, 2022.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10980-021-01336-1
dc.identifier.issn1572-9761
dc.identifier.issn0921-2973
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85114144351
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/222342
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofLandscape Ecology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCallicebus nigrifrons
dc.subjectForest restoration
dc.subjectFragmentation debate
dc.subjectLandscape composition
dc.subjectLandscape configuration
dc.subjectPopulation density
dc.titleForest loss and fragmentation can promote the crowding effect in a forest-specialist primateen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3906-025X[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0858-0324[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8221-3557[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2368-3540[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-7638-7086[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-4312-202X[6]

Arquivos

Coleções