Publicação:
Gabapentin versus dexchlorpheniramine as treatment for uremic pruritus: a randomised controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorGobo-Oliveira, Mariele [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPigari, Vitória G [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOgata, Matheus Sp [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMiot, Hélio A [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPonce, Daniela [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAbbade, Luciana Pf [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T16:04:46Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T16:04:46Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-01
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Uremic pruritus is a common symptom in chronic renal failure patients with undefined pathophysiology. Initial treatment involves topical therapy mainly in the form of moisturizers, however, in many cases, this is not sufficient to relieve itching. Systemic adjuvant therapy is therefore necessary, which commonly includes oral antihistamines, with limited success. Positive effects have been reported for gabapentin. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin vs. dexchlorpheniramine in reducing uremic pruritus. MATERIALS & METHODS: A randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical trial for haemodialysis patients with persistent pruritus was performed. Pre-randomisation, cold cream was used for 15 days by 71 participants. Those with pruritus who remained in the study (60 patients) were randomised to receive gabapentin (30 patients; GABA group) or dexchlorpheniramine (30 patients; DEX group) for 21 days. The primary outcome was the decrease in pruritus score and improvement in quality of life. RESULTS: After cold cream use, the participants demonstrated a 37.5% median reduction in Visual Analogue Scale (p<0.01) and a 50% reduction in Quality of Life in Dermatology (DLQI) score (p<0.01). There was an additional reduction of pruritus in both groups (p<0.01), with no difference between the two (p>0.7). The median DLQI was reduced from 2 to 1 in the GABA group and from 2 to 0 in the DEX group. Nineteen patients (32%) reported mild/moderate side effects without differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Uremic pruritus was reduced upon treatment with gabapentin or dexchlorpheniramine with good safety profiles; no difference was observed between the two treatments.en
dc.description.affiliationNursing Department Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dermatology and Radiotherapy Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Medical Clinic Nephrology Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespNursing Department Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dermatology and Radiotherapy Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Medical Clinic Nephrology Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.format.extent488-495
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2018.3356
dc.identifier.citationEuropean journal of dermatology : EJD, v. 28, n. 4, p. 488-495, 2018.
dc.identifier.doi10.1684/ejd.2018.3356
dc.identifier.issn1952-4013
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85056280353
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/188334
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean journal of dermatology : EJD
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectcold cream
dc.subjectdexchlorpheniramine
dc.subjectgabapentin
dc.subjecthaemodialysis
dc.subjecturemic pruritus
dc.titleGabapentin versus dexchlorpheniramine as treatment for uremic pruritus: a randomised controlled trialen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentClínica Médica - FMBpt
unesp.departmentDermatologia e Radioterapia - FMBpt
unesp.departmentEnfermagem - FMBpt

Arquivos