Rosuvastatin exposure in female Wistar rats alters uterine contractility and do not show evident (anti)estrogenic effects

dc.contributor.authorde Barros, Jorge Willian Franco [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVillela e Silva, Patrícia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Gustavo Venâncio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Katiussia Pinho [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Cibele dos Santos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMueller, André [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorValencise, Lethícia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPupo, André Sampaio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorKempinas, Wilma De Grava [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T11:15:29Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T11:15:29Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractStatins are 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor drugs that lead to serum-cholesterol-lowering effects. Rosuvastatin, a third-generation statin, has shown better results in reducing cholesterol concentrations when compared to other widely prescribed statins. Recent studies by our group reported that rosuvastatin impairs reproductive function in rats possibly by disrupting the reproductive-endocrine axis. In this study, we evaluated whether rosuvastatin presents estrogenic or antiestrogenic effects, by an in vivo uterotrophic assay in rats, and investigated the direct effect of this drug upon rat uterine tissue contractility both in non-gravid and gravid periods. Rosuvastatin exposure in vivo at doses of 0 (control), 3, and 10 mg/kg/d was not associated with estrogenic or antiestrogenic effects on uterine tissue. However, in vivo (doses of 0, 3, and 10 mg/kg/d) and ex vivo (concentrations of 0, 1, 10, and 100 µg/mL) exposures to this drug were related to alterations in uterine basal contraction pattern. Furthermore, in vivo and ex vivo rosuvastatin exposures potentially modulate the action of uterine contraction inducers carbachol, norepinephrine, and prostaglandin E2. Thus, rosuvastatin can affect uterine physiology not necessarily by an endocrine mechanism related to the estrogen signaling, but possibly by its pleiotropic effects, with indirect tissue and cellular interactions, since in vivo and ex vivo exposures of uterine fragments to rosuvastatin presented different responses in uterine contractile parameters, which require further studies upon the precise mechanism of action of this drug in female reproductive function.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Structural and Functional Biology Institute of Biosciences Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Biology and Toxicology São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biophysics and Pharmacology São Paulo State University (Unesp) Institute of Biosciences
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Structural and Functional Biology Institute of Biosciences Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Biology and Toxicology São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Biophysics and Pharmacology São Paulo State University (Unesp) Institute of Biosciences
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01480545.2021.1919139
dc.identifier.citationDrug and Chemical Toxicology.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01480545.2021.1919139
dc.identifier.issn1525-6014
dc.identifier.issn0148-0545
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85105217637
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/208642
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofDrug and Chemical Toxicology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectreproductive toxicology
dc.subjectStatin
dc.subjectuterine contractility
dc.subjectuterotrophic assay
dc.titleRosuvastatin exposure in female Wistar rats alters uterine contractility and do not show evident (anti)estrogenic effectsen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2460-8585[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2112-5123[9]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Instituto de Biociências, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentFarmacologia - IBBpt
unesp.departmentMorfologia - IBBpt

Arquivos