Agrometeorological models for forecasting coffee yield

dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira Aparecido, Lucas Eduardo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Souza Rolim, Glauco [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCamargo Lamparelli, Rubens Augusto
dc.contributor.authorde Souza, Paulo Sergio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Eder Ribeiro
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionRegional Cooperative of Coffee Growers
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:45:40Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:45:40Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-01
dc.description.abstractSome forecasting techniques have been tested with crop models using various statistical analyses for generating future scenarios of yield (Y). Forecasting, however, can be achieved by simply using regression analysis and carefully selecting independent variables (IVs) with time displacement relative to the dependent variable. The early forecasting of Y is the vanguard of agronomic modeling, promoting improvements in planning, allowing more rational strategic decisions, and increasing food and economic security. Climatic variables are the most important factors controlling the yield and quality of coffee (Coffea arabica L.). We calibrated and tested agrometeorological models to forecast the annual Y of coffee for six traditional producing regions in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. We used multiple linear regressions, selecting IVs to maximize the period between the forecast of Y and the harvest for each locality. The IVs were monthly meteorological variables from 1997 to 2014: air temperature, rainfall, potential evapotranspiration, soil water storage, water deficit, and water surplus. The IVs were selected by testing all possible combinations in the domain and avoiding multicollinearity. The agrometeorological models were accurate for all regions, and the earliest forecasts were 6 and 5 mo before harvest for the producing locations of Guaxupé and Coromandel, respectively. The models for yield forecasting for Guaxupé included the water deficit in July and October and July precipitation for the high-yield season and the water deficit in April and September and October precipitation for the low-yield season. The models for yield forecasting for Coromandel included the November water surplus and February and September precipitation for the high-yield season and precipitation for January, April, and October for the low-yield season.en
dc.description.affiliationDep. of Exact Sciences UNESP–São Paulo State Univ.
dc.description.affiliationUNICAMP Univ. of Campinas Interdisciplinary Center of Energy Planning (NIPE) Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz
dc.description.affiliationCOOXUPE Regional Cooperative of Coffee Growers, Guaxupé Ltda, 400
dc.description.affiliationUnespDep. of Exact Sciences UNESP–São Paulo State Univ.
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2014/05025-4
dc.format.extent249-258
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2016.03.0166
dc.identifier.citationAgronomy Journal, v. 109, n. 1, p. 249-258, 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.2134/agronj2016.03.0166
dc.identifier.issn1435-0645
dc.identifier.issn0002-1962
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85010338816
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/169393
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAgronomy Journal
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,938
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,938
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleAgrometeorological models for forecasting coffee yielden
dc.typeArtigo

Arquivos

Coleções