Biomechanical comparison of a modified TPLO plate, a locking compression plate, and plate-rod constructs applied medially in a proximal gap model in canine synthetic tibias

dc.contributor.authorSembenelli, G. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSouza, G. V. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorWittmaack, M. C.N. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorShimano, A. C.
dc.contributor.authorRocha, T. A.S.S. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMoraes, P. C.
dc.contributor.authorMinto, B. W.
dc.contributor.authorDias, L. G.G.G. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-29T12:41:32Z
dc.date.available2023-07-29T12:41:32Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to develop a modified tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) plate and to compare its biomechanical properties with a locking compression plate (LCP) and plate-rod constructs for the stabilization of experimentally induced gap fractures in canine synthetic tibias. The tibial models were assigned to either repair with a modified TPLO plate (Group 1), locking compression plate construct (Group 2), or plate-rod construct (Group 3). The specimens were loaded to failure in axial compression, three-point mediolateral and craniocaudal bending. There was no statistical difference between the three groups regarding stiffness (N/mm) and deformation (mm) in axial compression. The modified TPLO plate achieved load to failure similar to the plate-rod construct in craniocaudal bending. There was no significant difference between groups on mediolateral bending tests regarding load to failure and deformation. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in stiffness between groups 1 and 2. In conclusion, the modified TPLO plate had similar mechanical properties to LCP and plate-rod construct in the axial compression and bending tests. Nonetheless, clinical studies with a large population of dogs are required to determine the value of this new implant in proximal tibial fracture repair.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias FCAV/Unesp, SP
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade de São Paulo, SP
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista FCAV/Unesp, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias FCAV/Unesp, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista FCAV/Unesp, SP
dc.format.extent948-953
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-12557
dc.identifier.citationArquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia, v. 74, n. 5, p. 948-953, 2022.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1678-4162-12557
dc.identifier.issn1678-4162
dc.identifier.issn0102-0935
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85143869349
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/246463
dc.language.isoeng
dc.language.isopor
dc.relation.ispartofArquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBiomechanical tests
dc.subjectBone plate
dc.subjectFracture fixation
dc.subjectOsteosynthesis
dc.titleBiomechanical comparison of a modified TPLO plate, a locking compression plate, and plate-rod constructs applied medially in a proximal gap model in canine synthetic tibiasen
dc.titleComparação biomecânica entre placa de TPLO modificada, placa bloqueada e construção placa-pino intramedular aplicadas medialmente em modelo de fratura proximal em tíbias sintéticas caninaspt
dc.typeArtigo

Arquivos

Coleções