Logo do repositório
 

Growth performance of finishing feedlot lambs fed maize silage inoculated with Bacillus subtilis and lactic acid bacteria

dc.contributor.authorRabelo, C. H. S. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLara, E. C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBasso, F. C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorHarter, C. J.
dc.contributor.authorReis, R. A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-03T18:19:47Z
dc.date.available2019-10-03T18:19:47Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-01
dc.description.abstractWhole-crop maize forage was ensiled without inoculant (control), inoculated with Lactobacillus buchneri and L. plantarum at a rate of 1 x 10(5) cfu/g fresh forage per bacterium (LBLP), or inoculated with Bacillus subtilis and L. plantarum at a rate 1 x 10(5) cfu/g fresh forage per bacterium (BSLP) with the goal to investigate the growth performance of finishing feedlot lambs. Thirty Dorper x Santa Ines lambs (29 +/- 3.5 kg initial body weight) were used in the feedlot programme and assigned (n = 10) to one of three diets containing control, LBLP or BSLP silages in a 60:40 forage:concentrate ratio. Inoculation of maize silage did not alter dry matter intake (overall mean = 1.16 kg/day) and average daily gain (overall mean = 0.217 kg/day) of lambs. Consequently, feed efficiency remained unchanged. Inoculation of maize silage did not alter carcass and meat traits of lambs, with the exception of meat colour, wherein yellowness (b*) decreased by feeding LBLP and BSLP diets compared with the untreated diet. Regarding ruminal fermentation, there was an interaction between diets and the interval at which ruminal fluid was sampled for determining total volatile fatty acid concentration, but inoculation yielded no obvious results. In conclusion, the use of diets based on maize silage inoculated with L. plantarum combined with either L. buchneri or B. subtilis did not display relevant effects on growth performance of lambs; this response might be related to the limited impact of these bacterial inoculants on silage composition.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Santa Maria, Dept Anim Sci, BR-97105900 Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2012/25463-0
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2012/00412-4
dc.format.extent839-847
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859618000679
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Agricultural Science. New York: Cambridge Univ Press, v. 156, n. 6, p. 839-847, 2018.
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0021859618000679
dc.identifier.issn0021-8596
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/184090
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000449485300011
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCambridge Univ Press
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Agricultural Science
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectBacillus subtilis
dc.subjectLactobacillus spp.
dc.subjectmaize silage
dc.subjectruminal fermentation
dc.subjectsilage inoculant
dc.titleGrowth performance of finishing feedlot lambs fed maize silage inoculated with Bacillus subtilis and lactic acid bacteriaen
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.licensehttp://journals.cambridge.org/action/displaySpecialPage?pageId=4676
dcterms.rightsHolderCambridge Univ Press
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabalpt

Arquivos