Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Effect of monomer treatment and polymerisation methods on the bond strength of resin teeth to denture base material

dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Débora de Barros [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, Douglas Roberto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRicardo Barao, Valentim Adelino [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPero, Ana Carolina [UNESP] [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCompagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:32:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:32Z
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:32:53Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:32Z
dc.date.issued2009-09-01
dc.description.abstractBackground:The fracture between acrylic denture base material and artificial teeth is a common clinical occurrence in dental prosthodontic practice.Objective:To evaluate the bond strength between acrylic resins and resin denture teeth when submitted by two protocols of monomer liquid application on the tooth surface and using different polymerisation methods.Material and methods:Microwave-polymerised (Onda-Cryl), heat-polymerised (Classico) and autopolymerising (Jet) acrylic resins and a brand of resin denture teeth (Biotone) were used. The acrylic resins were polymerised according to the cycles: (A) microwave - fast cycle, Onda-Cryl; (B) microwave - long cycle, Onda-Cryl; (C) microwave - manufacturer's cycle, Onda-Cryl; (T) water bath - long cycle, Classico and (Q) bench polymerisation cycle, Jet. Thirty specimens were prepared for each polymerisation method; 10 were packed with acrylic resin after 60 s of monomer liquid application on the tooth surface, 10 after 180 s and 10 without any monomer liquid application. For the purpose of the study, a shear test was used. anova and Tukey tests were performed to identify significant differences (alpha = 0.05).Results:The highest bond strength values were found for monomer surface treatments, regardless of the polymerisation cycles. The highest significant values were found for cycles B (15.4 +/- 1.8 MPa), C (11.9 +/- 4.9 MPa) and T (15.4 +/- 2.6 MPa) for non-treated and 60 s methylmethacrylate treated groups. Comparing the monomer liquid treatment, they did not differ significantly (p > 0.05), except for cycle A (p < 0.05).Conclusion:Chemical treatment using monomer on the tooth surface prior to the acrylic resin packing improved the bond strength between resin denture tooth and acrylic resin, regardless of monomer liquid treatment protocols. The microwavable resin, polymerised by fast cycle and autopolymerising resin should be avoided for processing denture and denture repairs, respectively.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Aracatuba Dent Sch, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara Dent Sch, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Aracatuba Dent Sch, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara Dent Sch, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação para o Desenvolvimento da UNESP (FUNDUNESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 04/11250-9
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 04/10600-6
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFUNDUNESP: 850/04-DFP
dc.format.extent225-231
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2008.00262.x
dc.identifier.citationGerodontology. Malden: Wiley-blackwell Publishing, Inc, v. 26, n. 3, p. 225-231, 2009.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1741-2358.2008.00262.x
dc.identifier.issn0734-0664
dc.identifier.lattes7601364286525384
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15202
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000268926600011
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.relation.ispartofGerodontology
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.439
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,627
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectacrylic resinsen
dc.subjectbondingen
dc.subjectshear strengthen
dc.subjectdenture basesen
dc.subjecttoothen
dc.subjectartificialen
dc.subjectchemical treatmenten
dc.titleEffect of monomer treatment and polymerisation methods on the bond strength of resin teeth to denture base materialen
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.licensehttp://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html
dcterms.rightsHolderWiley-blackwell Publishing, Inc
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication3936e2e2-946a-42ab-8b9d-9521513200fc
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.author.lattes8921196002764597
unesp.author.lattes2999722781960616[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0203-2386[4]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentMateriais odontológicos e Prótese - FOApt
unesp.departmentMateriais Odontológicos e Prótese - FOARpt

Arquivos

Licença do Pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: