Logo do repositório

Association of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens: minimizes the adverse effects of necrotic enteritis in the gastrointestinal tract and improves zootechnical performance in broiler chickens

dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Romário A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Leandro A.M. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBrugnera, Heloisa C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Natália [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCasagrande, Mariana F. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMakino, Lilian C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBragança, Caio R.S.
dc.contributor.authorSchocken-Iturrino, Rubén Pablo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCardozo, Marita V.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionMinas Gerais State University
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:41:18Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-01
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and capacity of the probiotic composed of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, in improving the zootechnical performance of broiler chickens challenged with Eimeria spp. and Clostridium perfringens. The broilers were distributed in a completely randomized design in poultry isolators (12 birds each), resulting in 3 treatments: T1 (control, no challenge and no Bacillus in diet), T2 (challenged with Eimeria spp., followed by Clostridium perfringens infection and no Bacillus in the diet), and T3 (challenged with Eimeria spp., Clostridium perfringens and treated with Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens). They were evaluated for a period of 29 d, divided into preinitial (1–7 d of age), initial (8–21 d), and growth (22–29 d) phases. Assessments of body weight, weight gain, feed consumption, and feed conversion were conducted, along with the classification of the scores and optical microscopy of the tract gastrointestinal. The animals challenged and treated with the probiotic containing Bacillus spp. showed improved indicators of zootechnical performance. Additionally, the animals challenged and treated (T3) had a better score for intestinal lesions compared to the other treatment groups. Therefore, the probiotic consisting of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens could be considered an effective option for disease prevention and improving the zootechnical performance of broiler chickensen
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Reproduction Pathology and One Health School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Fisheries and Aquaculture Resources School of Agricultural Sciences of Vale do Ribeira São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationLaboratory of Microorganism Physiology Department of Biomedical Sciences and Health Minas Gerais State University, Minas Gerais
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Reproduction Pathology and One Health School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Fisheries and Aquaculture Resources School of Agricultural Sciences of Vale do Ribeira São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.103394
dc.identifier.citationPoultry Science, v. 103, n. 3, 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.psj.2023.103394
dc.identifier.issn1525-3171
dc.identifier.issn0032-5791
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85182157705
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/299056
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPoultry Science
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBacillus spp.
dc.subjectcoccidiosis
dc.subjectgrowth performance
dc.subjectgut function
dc.subjectone health
dc.titleAssociation of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens: minimizes the adverse effects of necrotic enteritis in the gastrointestinal tract and improves zootechnical performance in broiler chickensen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2153-4197[1]
unesp.author.orcid0009-0008-4982-4226[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-4377-2276[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9207-9339[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabalpt
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Centro de Aquicultura da UNESP, Jaboticabalpt
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias do Vale do Ribeira, Registropt

Arquivos