Logo do repositório

Water as Veneering Modeling Liquid Affects Microhardness of Glassy Matrix Veneering Ceramic

dc.contributor.authorAmaral, Marina
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Tiago M. B.
dc.contributor.authorTakahashi, Talita
dc.contributor.authorMoura, Gabriely S. D.
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Gabriela F. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMelo, Renata M. D. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Mutlu
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Taubaté
dc.contributor.institutionPhysics Department
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Zürich
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-29T12:40:11Z
dc.date.available2023-07-29T12:40:11Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose/Aim: To evaluate the effect of different veneering liquids used for modeling on microhardness, fracture toughness and biaxial flexural strength of a glass-veneering ceramic. Material and methods: The manufacturer recommended modeling liquid (ML), distilled water (DW), isopropyl alcohol (IA), 0.5% (P05), 1% (P1), and 2% (P2) polyethylene glycol solutions were mixed with feldspathic ceramic powder to form disc-shaped samples (n=20, 15 mm × 1.2 mm). After sintering, samples were mirror-polished and subjected to Vickers indentation (n=5) for measurement of microhardness and fracture toughness. The remaining 15 samples from each group were subjected to biaxial flexural strength. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Weibull analysis. Results: The microhardness was affected by veneering liquid (p=0.002): DW promoted higher microhardness values than ML and IA. Fracture toughness (p=0.301) and flexural strength (p=0.930) were not affected by the veneering liquid but Weibull parameters were affected. All groups presented surface pores under high magnification. Conclusion: Even though the use of DW led to higher values of surface microhardness than the ML, all obtained values are inside the range of enamel microhardness values reported in the literature. Such parameters may affect an-tagonist wear and should be reported in clinical trials.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dentistry University of Taubaté, Rua dos Operários, n9
dc.description.affiliationTechnological Institute of Aeronautics Physics Department, Praça Marechal Eduardo Gomes, 50
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthesis São Paulo State University, Av. Eng. Francisco José Longo, 777
dc.description.affiliationDivision of Dental Biomaterials Center for Dental and Oral Medicine University of Zürich, Plattenstrasse 11
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthesis São Paulo State University, Av. Eng. Francisco José Longo, 777
dc.format.extent262-266
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2372Amaral05
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, v. 30, n. 4, p. 262-266, 2022.
dc.identifier.doi10.1922/EJPRD_2372Amaral05
dc.identifier.issn2396-8893
dc.identifier.issn0965-7452
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85143180887
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/246409
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectModeling Liquid
dc.subjectPolyethylene Glycol
dc.subjectPorcelain
dc.titleWater as Veneering Modeling Liquid Affects Microhardness of Glassy Matrix Veneering Ceramicen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt

Arquivos