Logo do repositório

Comparing the wound healing potential of natural rubber latex serum and F1-protein: An in vivo approach

dc.contributor.authorMorais, Pamela Cássia Rocha
dc.contributor.authorFloriano, Juliana Ferreira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Cristiane Garcia Paulino [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorChagas, Ana Laura Destro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMussagy, Cassamo Ussemane
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Nayrim Brizuela [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSant'Ana Pegorin Brasil, Giovana [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVicentine, Karina Ferrazzoli Devienne
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Lenaldo Branco
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Carlo José Freire
dc.contributor.authorSoares de Oliveira Junior, Robson Tadeu
dc.contributor.authorCaetano, Guilherme Ferreira
dc.contributor.authorLi, Bingbing
dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Lindomar Soares
dc.contributor.authorHerculano, Rondinelli Donizetti [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Mendonça, Ricardo José
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionImperial College London
dc.contributor.institutionPontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity Center of Hermínio Ometto Foundation (FHO)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation (TIBI)
dc.contributor.institutionCalifornia State University
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:50:00Z
dc.date.issued2024-02-01
dc.description.abstractChronic wounds pose significant health concerns. Current treatment options include natural compounds like natural rubber latex (NRL) from Hevea brasiliensis. NRL, particularly the F1 protein fraction, has demonstrated bioactivity, biocompatibility, and angiogenic effects. So far, there is no study comparing F1 protein with total NRL serum, and the necessity of downstream processing remains unknown. Here, we evaluated the angiogenic potential of F1 protein compared to total NRL serum and the need for downstream processing. For that, ion exchange chromatography (DEAE-Sepharose), antioxidant activity, physicochemical characterization, cell culture in McCoy fibroblasts, and wound healing in Balb-C mice were performed. Also, the evaluation of histology and collagen content and the levels of inflammatory mediators were quantified. McCoy fibroblast cell assay showed that F1 protein (0.01 %) and total NRL serum (0.01 %) significantly increased cell proliferation by 47.1 ± 11.3 % and 25.5 ± 2.5 %, respectively. However, the AA of F1 protein (78.9 ± 0.8 %) did not show a significant difference compared to NRL serum (77.0 ± 1.1 %). F1 protein and NRL serum were more effective in wound management in rodents. Histopathological analysis confirmed accelerated healing and advanced tissue repair. Similarly, the F1 protein (0.01 %) increased collagen, showing that this fraction can stimulate the synthesis of collagen by fibroblastic cells. Regarding cytokines production (IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ), F1 protein and NRL serum did not exert an impact on the synthesis of these cytokines. Furthermore, we did not observe statistically significant changes in dosages of enzymes (MPO and EPO) among the groups. Nevertheless, Nitric Oxide dosage was reduced drastically when the F1 protein (0.01 %) protein was applied topically. These findings contribute to the understanding of F1 protein and NRL serum properties and provide insights into cost-effectiveness and practical applications in medicine and biotechnology. Therefore, further research is needed to assess the economic feasibility of downstream processing for NRL-based herbal medicine derived from Hevea brasiliensis.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biochemistry Pharmacology and Physiology Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM), Minas Gerais
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University (UNESP) Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationNational Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London
dc.description.affiliationBioengineering & Biomaterials Group São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Km 01 Araraquara-Jaú Road, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationScience Faculty São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationEscuela de Agronomía Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas y de los Alimentos Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
dc.description.affiliationInstitute of Chemistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Pathology Genetics and Evolution Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM), Minas Gerais
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Microbiology Immunology and Parasitology Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM), Minas Gerais
dc.description.affiliationGraduate Program of Orthodontics University Center of Hermínio Ometto Foundation (FHO), SP
dc.description.affiliationDivision of Dermatology Department of Internal Medicine University of São Paulo (USP) Ribeirão Preto Medical School, SP
dc.description.affiliationTerasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation (TIBI), 11507 West Olympic Blvd
dc.description.affiliationAutonomy Research Center for STEAHM (ARCS) California State University
dc.description.affiliationFaculty of Philosophy Sciences and Languages at Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo (USP), 3900 Bandeirantes Avenue, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University (UNESP) Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespBioengineering & Biomaterials Group São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Km 01 Araraquara-Jaú Road, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespScience Faculty São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespInstitute of Chemistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
dc.description.sponsorshipPró-Reitoria de Pesquisa, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdPró-Reitoria de Pesquisa, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul: 13/2022
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2018/07342-8
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2021/09207-3
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 317203/2021-5
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213754
dc.identifier.citationBiomaterials Advances, v. 157.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213754
dc.identifier.issn2772-9508
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85182026043
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/300560
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBiomaterials Advances
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAngiogenic potential
dc.subjectChronic wounds
dc.subjectDownstream processing
dc.subjectF1 protein
dc.subjectNatural rubber latex
dc.titleComparing the wound healing potential of natural rubber latex serum and F1-protein: An in vivo approachen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication95697b0b-8977-4af6-88d5-c29c80b5ee92
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationbc74a1ce-4c4c-4dad-8378-83962d76c4fd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery95697b0b-8977-4af6-88d5-c29c80b5ee92
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Araraquarapt
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Química, Araraquarapt

Arquivos