Logo do repositório

Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale Revised (CRBS-R) for hybrid delivery

dc.contributor.authorGrace, Sherry L.
dc.contributor.authorGhanbari, Mahdieh
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Mayara Moura Moura Alves da
dc.contributor.authorVanderlei, Luiz Carlos Marques [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGhisi, Gabriela Lima de Melo
dc.contributor.institutionYork University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity Health Network
dc.contributor.institutionShahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionAdamantina University Center
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Toronto
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T19:33:55Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-15
dc.description.abstractObjective To test the measurement properties of the revised version of the English Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-R), suitable for hybrid delivery, structural validity, internal reliability, as well as face, cross-cultural, construct and criterion validity were assessed. Design Cross-sectional study, where participants completed an online survey via Qualtrics (2023-2024). Setting Multicentre, with cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes recruiting patients globally; most patients stemmed from a hybrid programme in Iran and supervised programme in Brazil. Participants Participants include inpatients or outpatients with a cardiovascular diagnosis or procedure that is indicated for participation in CR. Measures In addition to sociodemographic and CR use items, the 21-item CRBS-R was administered. It assesses multilevel barriers and was revised based on a literature review. Responses range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater barriers. Results 235 patients participated from all 6 WHO regions. Items were rated as highly applicable, and open-ended responses revealing no key barriers were omitted, supporting face and cross-cultural validity. Cronbach's α for the total CRBS-R was 0.82. Principal components analysis resulted in the extraction of 4 components, which collectively accounted for 60.5% of the variance and were all internally consistent. Construct validity was supported by associations of total CRBS scores with work status (p = 0.04), exercise history (p = 0.01) and social support (p = 0.03). Total CRBS-R scores were significantly lower in patients who were referred and enrolled versus those who were not (both p≤0.01), confirming criterion validity. Conclusions The CRBS-R is a reliable and valid scale comprising four subscales, applicable to hybrid CR across diverse settings. It can serve as a valuable tool to support identification of patient's CR barriers, to optimise secondary prevention utilisation globally.en
dc.description.affiliationFaculty of Health York University
dc.description.affiliationKITE Research Institute University Health Network
dc.description.affiliationYazd Cardiovascular Research Center Non-communicable Diseases Research Institute Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences
dc.description.affiliationAdamantina University Center, Adamantina
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Technology and Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente
dc.description.affiliationDepartment pf Physical Therapy University of Toronto
dc.description.affiliationUnespSchool of Technology and Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090261
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open, v. 14, n. 10, 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090261
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85206633101
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/304121
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCardiovascular Disease
dc.subjectHealth Services Accessibility
dc.subjectPsychometrics
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.titlePsychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale Revised (CRBS-R) for hybrid deliveryen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationbbcf06b3-c5f9-4a27-ac03-b690202a3b4e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverybbcf06b3-c5f9-4a27-ac03-b690202a3b4e
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-7063-3610 0000-0001-7063-3610[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-7946-3718 0000-0001-7946-3718[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Presidente Prudentept

Arquivos