Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
The influence of bone quality on the biomechanical behavior of full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses

dc.contributor.authorFaverani, Leonardo Perez [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRicardo Barao, Valentim Adelino
dc.contributor.authorRamalho-Ferreira, Gabriel [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDelben, Juliana Aparecida [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Mayara Barbosa [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGarcia Júnior, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAssunção, Wirley Goncalves [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T13:10:42Z
dc.date.available2014-12-03T13:10:42Z
dc.date.issued2014-04-01
dc.description.abstractWe evaluated the influence of bone tissue type on stress distribution in full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses using a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Stresses in cortical and trabecular bones were also investigated. Edentulous mandible models with four implants inserted into the interforaminal region were constructed from different bone types: type 1 - compact bone; type 2 - compact bone surrounding dense trabecular bone; type 3 a thin layer of compact bone surrounding trabecular bone; and type 4 - low-quality trabecular bone. The mandible was restored with a full-arch implant-supported fixed prosthesis. A 100-N oblique load was applied to the left lower first molar of the prosthesis. The maximum (sigma max) and minimum (sigma min) principal stress values were determined. The sigma max in the type 4 cortical bone was 22.56% higher than that in the type 1 bone. The sigma min values in the cortical bone were similar among all the bone types. For the superstructure, increases of 9.04% in the sigma max and 11.74% in the sigma min in G4 (type 4 bone) compared with G1 (type 1 bone) were observed. For the implants, the highest stress values were located in G4, and the lowest values were observed in GI. In the trabecular bone, the highest stress was generated in G1 and G2. In conclusion, the more compact bones (types 1 and 2) are the most suitable for supporting full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses, and poor bone quality may increase the risk of biological and mechanical failure. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Surg, BR-16015050 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Integrated Clin, BR-16015050 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Campinas UNICAMP, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Dept Prosthodont & Periodontol, BR-13414903 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Araraquara Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-14801903 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Surg, BR-16015050 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Integrated Clin, BR-16015050 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Araraquara Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-14801903 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 10/09857-3
dc.format.extent164-170
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.013
dc.identifier.citationMaterials Science & Engineering C-materials For Biological Applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 37, p. 164-170, 2014.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.013
dc.identifier.issn0928-4931
dc.identifier.lattes8843503367647381
dc.identifier.lattes4438747643373395
dc.identifier.lattes1527011976590326
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/112435
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000333795200022
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofMaterials Science & Engineering C-materials For Biological Applications
dc.relation.ispartofjcr5.080
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,110
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectDental implantsen
dc.subjectProstheses and implantsen
dc.subjectFinite element analysisen
dc.titleThe influence of bone quality on the biomechanical behavior of full-arch implant-supported fixed prosthesesen
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.licensehttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dcterms.rightsHolderElsevier B.V.
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication3936e2e2-946a-42ab-8b9d-9521513200fc
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3936e2e2-946a-42ab-8b9d-9521513200fc
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.author.lattes1527011976590326
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentCirurgia e Clínica Integrada - FOApt
unesp.departmentMateriais Odontológicos e Prótese - FOARpt

Arquivos